Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,358
Sorry, but don't really get the sudden Baldock love-in. My fault, I'm sure
I was referring to posts above saying that they are 'back' for Saturday. We know smoke and mirrors are used by clubs referring to the 'availability' of players.
Sorry, but don't really get the sudden Baldock love-in. My fault, I'm sure
Given that both are always first choice picks, Hughton has said in public they are "fine" and that they are in "contention" for Saturday.
"Both are in contention. They have trained and they are fine."
then not too much of a stretch to say "they are back". Can't see much smoke. Or mirrors.
Hughton has often said what you have quoted and 'tweaks' have subsequently been picked up in training, apparently.
I don't take everything Hughton or the club says as gospel unlike some do. Of course it's his job to play 'games' with opposing managers and that's fair enough. If they are selected then great.
Sorry, but don't really get the sudden Baldock love-in. My fault, I'm sure
Sorry, but don't really get the sudden Baldock love-in. My fault, I'm sure
You're Scottish
Sorry, but don't really get the sudden Baldock love-in. My fault, I'm sure
You've often got players disastrously wrong previously ("one-in-ten-Glenn" ) so I wouldn't worry too much about it.
Reading that, it does make me question why we didn't bring in someone as good or better in his position, match fit and ready.
If he is harbouring an injury which is just waiting to flare up, that is more than a abit of a concern.
Seriously, if Baldock is the answer, then you haven't understood the question. Sake!
Akpom will prove to be the answer, you saw it here first.
That statement puts me into a state of panic.
Akpom will prove to be the answer, you saw it here first.
Haven't looked back but were you one of the Duffy dissers when we signed him?
How can you possibly write off a young player after seeing him play in a struggling side for about half an hour?