Good points.
However not all evil people are psychopaths and not all psychopaths are evil. Equally a lot of infamous serial killers are wrongly regarded as psychopaths.....
Not sure that argument stands up too well, considering that:I understand why the OP is askance about this.
Here is my take.
1. It isn't muslimy
2. It isn't Brexitty
3. She's white
4. Nothing to see here.
Indeed, the most iconic fictional representation of that label, and one which many people inevitably came to associate with that term at the time, is Norman Bates as depicted in Hitchcock's film "Psycho".
Ironically Norman, despite the film's title, doesn't fit the profile of what is considered to be a psychopathic (or narcissistic) personality disorder. It is more likely he suffers from a multiple personality disorder, as well as a few other issues obviously, but psychopathy not being one of them.
Indeed. Lots of psychopaths in my game (medical research). One is particularly charming. They don't kill anyone (literally or metaphorically) unless the (feel they) have to.
I understand why the OP is askance about this.
Here is my take.
1. It isn't muslimy
2. It isn't Brexitty
3. She's white
4. Nothing to see here.
You missed the most important one........the dead babies were white. Dead black babies matter much more, and even more so if they can be photographed (say) washed up on a coastline.
Had they been black we would have a campaign by footballers, tv celebrities, tv specials, a cenotaph, and football matches would be proceeded by the players curling up in a foetal position on the pitch as a sign of solidarity.
I’m disappointed, I thought you knew better.
A "friend of mine" thinks it is a bit odd that you know so much about the killing habits of your "particularly charming colleague".
Wow. That took a bit of time type out too, and not once did you think, nah, that's a bit much, *delete*
You have no idea of the race of the poor dead babies! None! So your post, regardless of freedom of speech, is based on nothing and out of the blue to a vast degree.
I’ve no idea why this particular case has generated so little reaction on NSC.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-54930233
Is it due to becoming desensitised to such things? That seems improbable given that the charge is the murder of eight babies and attempt to do the same to ten more.
Is it because the story has become squeezed by personality politics (Trump, Cummings) and events? (Someone dropping out of Strictly had more air time on the BBC 6pm news last night than this case).
It’s not a criticism of anyone here, but given the (rightful) headlines in relation to the death of Peter Sutcliffe and the terrible things he did this case seems to have slipped under the radar and provoke little reaction.
I can understand why my fellow mod started this thread but it went from 0 to cesspool in an incredibly short time.
Perhaps we should all just agree that the killing of babies, whatever their race, is the lowest of the low and that we hope the accused has a fair trial in accordance with the law.
I understand why the OP is askance about this.
Here is my take.
1. It isn't muslimy
2. It isn't Brexitty
3. She's white
4. Nothing to see here.
You missed the most important one........the dead babies were white. Dead black babies matter much more, and even more so if they can be photographed (say) washed up on a coastline.
Had they been black we would have a campaign by footballers, tv celebrities, tv specials, a cenotaph, and football matches would be proceeded by the players curling up in a foetal position on the pitch as a sign of solidarity.
I’m disappointed, I thought you knew better.
It’s an incredibly sad case, that’s for sure - I will always remember watching on helplessly as NHS doctors and nurses raced to save the lives of my son and daughter during their respective births. My son didn’t take his first breath for over seven minutes after his delivery, whilst my little girl suffered shoulder dystocia, where the baby’s head is delivered but shoulder remains lodged in the birth canal. On both occasions, the care they received was outstanding and my children literally owe their lives to them.
That’s what makes this case so sad and upsetting for me - the idea than someone in the room on those days could have been on the ‘opposite team’ doesn’t bear thinking about.
But someone earlier mentioned the case of Rebecca Leighton, whose own life was destroyed by the press after being charged with the killing of several of her patients, only for it later to be discovered it was in fact the work of someone else entirely. I think therefore, it’s best not to cast judgement until the case has run its course.
I have to admit, I’ve wrestled with the idea that I may subconsciously be giving her that benefit of the doubt because she doesn’t ‘look like’ someone whodunnit - I don’t know what people who commit such evil acts do look like but I do have to wonder whether I’d take a different stance if she had unkempt, scraggy hair and mad staring eyes. But then the story of Christopher Jeffries is another case which highlights how that kind of assassination by media can turn out.
Utterly ridiculous post and pathetically typical
someone responds and escalates .......... ridiculing original post.
usual suspects wet the bed and ignore the original stupid cretin post.
Thank you for putting this back on topic. Incredibly sensitive subject.