LamieRobertson
Not awoke
I don't know if I have wooshed you, or you have me
Lol..no not me
I don't know if I have wooshed you, or you have me
Very interesting video. Thanks for posting.
I am of the opinion the first Barnes challenge was much worse than the second. Completely premediated.
Great stuff from Dyche.Sorry if I'm boring anyone by bringing this to the top again and you can tell me to buzz off (I'm posting this first obviously ).
Here's how you conduct yourself Jose Mourwhingeo............
I watched MoTD last night and was 'interested' to hear Savage banging on about the first penalty appeal. He claimed that his hands were in the way and he could have moved them out of the way, he'd 'made himself big' and that it was a nailed on penalty. This is the same guy who said exactly the opposite about a very similar situation during the Arsenal game against us. Double standards? Siding with the big boys? Between him and Shearer, it was a completely one-sided assessment of the game and smacks of jumping on the bandwagon, instead of a balanced assessment.
SD makes some very good points, and noticed the same as I did, that the ball hit his thigh before his hand. Yes, it's his team and he's defending them, but even so, I thought he came across very well. I've not seen the Jose appearance on Goals on Sunday, but there are a few images flying around commenting about how his team aren't exactly angelic, and then there is also this (apologies if fixtures)... http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/dec/24/jose-mourinho-arsenal-chelsea-arsene-wenger
Makes you think...
If you want to encourage kids to play football properly assaults like that on other players they should be jumped on, so to speak.
Yes let's ban players from passing the ball, that will improve the game!
I appreciate that Digger polarises opinions but in my view
1: Mourinho is a master at switching the attention away from a relatively poor performance by his team by turning the focus to the referee or an opponent. Ferguson was the same.
2: If Matic really had come close to having his leg broken, or had indeed been seriously injured, how come he was up off the ground in about 0.00003 seconds after he slid into Barnes?
3: After listening to him a few times this season, I think Sean Dyche is my favourite ginger of all time,
It's irrelevant what Mourinho does or doesn't say and, despite his measured comments, it isn't about what Dyche says either. It doesn't matter whether Matic was injured or not. It is about whether the follow through from Barnes was or wasn't with some intent.
I appreciate that Digger polarises opinions but in my view
1: Mourinho is a master at switching the attention away from a relatively poor performance by his team by turning the focus to the referee or an opponent. Ferguson was the same.
2: If Matic really had come close to having his leg broken, or had indeed been seriously injured, how come he was up off the ground in about 0.00003 seconds after he slid into Barnes?
3: After listening to him a few times this season, I think Sean Dyche is my favourite ginger of all time,
If that had happened to one of our players this thread would read differently, and knowing March's luck he would have had his leg broken in three if it happened to him.
As I pointed out, Calderon did break the Newport player's leg in almost exactly the same way. It ended his career. That's why I don't think Barnes had any intent, because Matic wasn't injured. If Barnes had meant it, Matic would have been badly injured.
Yet more disgusting images of violence in the game. I'm starting to question whether I should continue to watch a sport which has become a barbaric spectacle more at home in the colosseum.
But if he'd been given a yellow for the first, he's more likely to have been more cautious later in the game.Many have thought the first incident deserved a yellow, so if the last one did as well, and they had both been given, he would have been off