Rich Suvner
Skint years RIP
The Auditor said:iii) The post is reliable !
which would be relevent if a new scheme was introduced also... they're not going to keep you a ticket indefinitely!
not really a criticism of current system imho
The Auditor said:iii) The post is reliable !
Rich Suvner said:FACT - many games people have paid on the day, so any type of allocation is unfair cos the club do not have records
Uncle Buck said:
However I do not think all the tickets should be allocated on a loyalty basis as you will once again alienate floating support. Hence going down the road of 70% of the tickets being allocated to the most loyal supporters and the remaining 30% being allocated via a ballot to those that were unsuccesful as they did not have the relevant number of points (this system is entirely stolen from the FA and Englandfans).
fatboy said:The club are prepared to shit on the regular support because they know that they will still come to the next game, but they are not prepared to shit on the floating support as these people may not come again.
Rich Suvner said:fatboy - ticket stubs are not always handed out when you pay on the gate.
Uncle Buck said:In this division they are.
Indestructible Gull said:Also, it wouldn't be difficult for the club to arrange some sort of voucher to give out at away turnstiles if stubs where not given out.
Rich Suvner said:fatboy - ticket stubs are not always handed out when you pay on the gate.
Rich Suvner said:the less games that are all-ticket the better, and the system that you guys want (all tickets purchased on-system) will ultimately harm our away support and the ability of people to make a last minute decision to attend games
Faldo said:I think the current system is fine. If you want a ticket bad enough, get in early. If you miss out there is no one to blame but yourself (although I missed out on West Ham - Tis my fault for being a lazy arse.... and west hams, natch!).
If you want a ticket, get in early - rule of thumb FOR EVERYTHING...
Rich Suvner said:as for the application-race via post, at least those of you in sussex can drop yours off in the middle of the night at the shop, thus bypassing the post completely.
Uncle Buck said:Exactly they have done it in the past. Towards the end of the first season at Gillingham, they handed vouchers out and the more vouchers you had the higher up the list you went for the first dibs of the season tickets at Withdean. (At the time we were meant to be coming back to Brighton after one year away).
Lord Bracknell said:Postal applications, on a first come first served basis, at least give everyone the same chance of getting a Rotherham ticket. Any other system won't.
Indestructible Gull said:The thing is the club simply will not budge on this matter and listen to the FANS and look again at the different options. Shame really given the 200k that has been raised by these very fans through the 'Alive & Kicking' campaign.
Lord Bracknell said:Yes, Uncle Buck. But that doesn't deliver a record of the sale to the Club Shop.
If, say, a ticket bought at Derby is to count for anything, it would be necessary for the ticket holder to get the evidence to Queens Road. How? By post and more unproductive administrative time in the ticket office? Or by making tickets available for the Rotherham game only to people who turn up and queue at Queens Road with a wallet full of scraps of paper collected across the season?
And how would you resolve the argument that says that season ticket holders should get priority over people who "only" spend hundreds of pounds travelling to loads of away games?
Postal applications, on a first come first served basis, at least give everyone the same chance of getting a Rotherham ticket. Any other system won't.
fatboy said:Loyalty points could only be given to all ticket games if it is really too much of a hassle to give out a ticket to those who pay on the gate.
Faldo said:
There is simply no need for a radical overhaul of our ticketing procedures.