- Jul 7, 2003
- 47,639
Turns out police budgets are only protected in cash terms, not in real terms therefore police in line for real terms cuts.
Well, from my understanding (and no, I've not read the whole thing, I admit), it appears as though he's devolving a few of the decisions in terms of police budgets to the Police & Crime Commissioners' office. These are of course elected (and political) posts, so there will presumably be a degree of toeing the party line here. Impossible to say which way that will go for now at least. I'm not really sure of Katy Bourne's position in Sussex, for example.
It's all a big smokescreen, I suspect, to ensure that if things do go tits up from a (police) spending point of view, it won't be directly attributable to a man who may well decide to stand for Conservative party leader when Cameron waltzes off at the end of the current term, isn't it?