1
1066gull
Guest
Gonna have several polls to finally get NSC's opinion.
I say 15 as BARE minimum. 16-17 is the right limit though.
I say 15 as BARE minimum. 16-17 is the right limit though.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,286
15 is illegal so 16 and above.
EDIT: And haven't you asked this before?
EDIT: And haven't you asked this before?
This looks WELL DODGY!
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,286
Braders
Abi Fletchers Gimpboy
exactly
1
1066gull
Guest
- Thread starter
- #6
It got me thinking after SHIZ DOLPHIN's thread about a teacher, and we had a discussion about this a few months ago on NSC.
I think 16, but I have seen people 18 and 15 together in the past.
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
My dad was 18 and my mum was 14 when they started dating. They;ve been married 45 years now.
That makes him practically a paedo though really.
That makes him practically a paedo though really.
Don't get me started
One Nation under CCTV
- Jul 24, 2007
- 349
Formula for any bounder who is thinking of a younger model 1/2 your age plus 7 years so 16 here is about right
hart's shirt
Well-known member
Would it make a difference if he was blind?
Uncle Spielberg
Well-known member
11 might be pushing it a tad don't you think AID ?.
What sort of a poll is this.........PEADO!
Bad Ash
Unregistered User
And why isn't there a 10 and under option for those who like them prepubescent?
NMH
Banned
I'd look at a guy like this:
You should be reported to the mods for posting a picture of a fat mongoloid.
Posting a photo of a Downs Syndrome kid is neither funny, or clever.
butchy
Well-known member
horrid little man
Last edited:
brighton2win
New member
- Aug 21, 2005
- 1,887
aids you've got serious f***ing issues mate. twat.