So I have been reliably informed.
The question is then did he proper fill his pants?
Cacked himself and asked to continue the conversation "on line".
That shit Penguin is posting is wrong. I don't know who he is talking about but if I were a mod I'd ban him and If I were Hiney I'd have a severe word in person.
Oh dear Penguin, you've been a bit of a silly boy haven't you?
So Hine can have a dig at me without any right of reply? I was nothing to do with this thread but he decided to bring me into it.
And it wasn't continue the conversation "online", it was continue the conversation "down there" but was mis-reported.
So Hine can have a dig at me without any right of reply? I was nothing to do with this thread but he decided to bring me into it.
And it wasn't continue the conversation "online", it was continue the conversation "down there" but was mis-reported.
So Hine can have a dig at me without any right of reply? I was nothing to do with this thread but he decided to bring me into it.
And it wasn't continue the conversation "online", it was continue the conversation "down there" but was mis-reported.
So Hine can have a dig at me without any right of reply? I was nothing to do with this thread but he decided to bring me into it.
And it wasn't continue the conversation "online", it was continue the conversation "down there" but was mis-reported.
Or combine both and call it brunch - simple.
The best approach I've found by the way, is to put on a Hawiian shirt, SIDLE up a nice young filly and utter those immortal words:
"shall we discuss this online?"
Works a treat
But bringing his partner's name into it was a bit OTT.
How was 'down there' mistaken for 'online'?