B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
You know the thread is deteriorating when two posters argue over stats on wikipedia!
TBH Wikipedia is inconsistent between its 2 pages! And others have even more favourable CMS stats.
You know the thread is deteriorating when two posters argue over stats on wikipedia!
TBH Wikipedia is inconsistent between its 2 pages! And others have even more favourable CMS stats.
Here you go:
CMS appeared played 2249 of 3362 league minutes prior to his long term injury. He scored eleven times in that period resulting in a rate of one goal every 204.5mins.
As he played 66.89% of the season before his injury, let's make an assumption he plays the same percentage of the reamining game time.
The reamining games, league and play offs, consisted of 1240mins. 66.89% of that is approximately 829.5mins
At a goal rate of one goal every 204.5mins, that means in 829.5mins he will score 4 goals.
CMS was therefore on target for 15 goals last season, before his long term injury.
Here you go:
CMS appeared played 2249 of 3362 league minutes prior to his long term injury. He scored eleven times in that period resulting in a rate of one goal every 204.5mins.
As he played 66.89% of the season before his injury, let's make an assumption he plays the same percentage of the reamining game time.
The reamining games, league and play offs, consisted of 1240mins. 66.89% of that is approximately 829.5mins
At a goal rate of one goal every 204.5mins, that means in 829.5mins he will score 4 goals.
CMS was therefore on target for 15 goals last season, before his long term injury.
There are a lot of assumptions in there, but if you say so.
I agree with what you say, but the one difference is that Burnley play with what too many on NSC want, which is two up top. Beyond wads more cash, this is the only explanation I can think of for Barnes to prefer Burnley to Brighton. Oh, I almost forgot, there's the abuse he undergoes from Brighton fans. That is something that we can do something about.
There are two assumptions:
1: That his goal scoring rate remains consistent
2: That his game time rate remains consistent.
Those are the same assumptions anyone makes when they make a crude "he scored this many in the first half of the season, ergo he'll score this many in the second half". Only I've used more accurate numbers.
Fair enough, but I would say that both are arguable. Nevertheless, 15 would still be good at this level, and not meriting disrespect from one of his alleged supporters.
Are you suggesting he doesn't run like a girl?
Haven't read the thread in full but £1 million? Yes please. Barnes is not going to get any better than being an average Championship striker. We presumably have sights set on the Premiership and if we make it, we need to have quality players to keep us there. Barnes along with CMS are not those kind of players.
Andy Naylor @AndyNaylorArgus 55s
News from Burnley that former #bhafc striker Sam Vokes has signed a new contract. Barnes would be third choice there, at least until summer.
It makes you wonder if Barnes was being 'used' as a bargaining tool by Burnley?
Seems a bit harsh. Barnes is improving all the time. And I'm not sure we've seen the best of CMS yet.
I'm not sure we've seen the best of CMS yet.
Barnes: I really want him to do well, but I just can't see him as improving enough to be a Premiership striker.
.