fosters headband
Well-known member
.......Fred Binney 35 goals in 70 apps
Gary Nelson 47 goals in 144 apps
.......Fred Binney 35 goals in 70 apps
Leeds in for Barnes too according to Naylor.
Thanks Acker. I am now back in your congregation. *sip*
I Guess this won't affect the price. We've already accepted an offer from Burnley, Leeds will offer the same.
It's just up to Barnes to decide which of the 3 clubs he want's to play for.
A move to Leeds will be tempting for Barnes. The Champions League is the place to be these days.
Accepting an offer from Burnley doesn't mean if a higher offer from Leeds is made we have to turn it down because Burnley were first in the queue.
We aren't going to sell Barnes, Buckley, Leo and Liam in this window, as various rumours have suggested. At the very most, we'll part with two of them.
From the outside looking in, Liam and Ash do seem the most likely but there's no doubt in my mind that Barnes will be an Albion player for the rest of this season.
I also don't understand why Burnley would relentlessly pursue him. There's players with much better goal-scoring records available.
i may be missing something but how can nakhi wells (who looks like he'd blow away in a strong wind) be worth 1.25m and barnes only go for 800k?
i may be missing something but how can nakhi wells (who looks like he'd blow away in a strong wind) be worth 1.25m and barnes only go for 800k?
I'd much prefer him to go to Burnley than Leeds but there you are, find it strange that there's clubs competing for Barnes but not Bridders.
I don't think transfer values are ONLY based on weight.
I don't think transfer values are ONLY based on weight.
I'm merely suggesting that there's not going to be a bidding war that pushes up the price for Barnes.
If Leeds know that we've accepted say, £800k, then why would they need to pay any more?
ok, but messi aside can you think of any bantamweights banging them in at a high level?
Welbeck's pretty slim?
PETERRRR CROUUUUCCCHHH