NMH
Banned
Yes we have, little dick is back from massaging his ego
Then why is it your business, cvnt?
Yes we have, little dick is back from massaging his ego
Are you also having trouble with normal thinking?
The thread was started with a post that was matter-of-fact, and certainly didn't suggest some ethereal up-in-the-air hanging doubts about whether or not the person was enticed by, or was further worked up by anyone else. He claimed his guilt.
IF the verdict was "Guilty" and he hadn't commented - we could intimate that perhaps he might have been unfairly treated. But HE said he WAS guilty, so he wasn't unfairly treated.
There was no need for conjecture surrounding his activity, nor doubt about whether he should have been punished.
Have you got it now?
I love the way you try to keep people in line on here. Are you wearing your stewards jacket while you post?
I love the way you try to keep people in line on here. Are you wearing your stewards jacket while you post?
It's a 'publikvärd' jacket actually, and keeping people in line is easy compared to some of these 'tards
Definitely and serious anger management issues as well
Maybe Bozza could provide a shambok smilie you could post to them?
Nope, just shoving it back at you how you want it. You've never been much of a contributor though.
Wtf is a shambok smilie when it's at home, loonatic?
You really do amaze me with your people skills, they are fantastic and obviously something spotted by your current employer.
Why thanks, you are perceptive after all. I am indeed quite well regarded in my work, for my ability to teach, and look after people.
I didn't know you had been looking at my CV for references.
A Shambok is the long South African Police Truncheon, I hope you know what a smilie is? Maybe they should be renamed Grumpies?
There is no need, it is bleeding obvious from the way you post what sort of person you are - no really very hard to work out.
Do you charge for your work as an anal-yst, and did you qualify at Dukes' Mound
Are you also having trouble with normal thinking?
The thread was started with a post that was matter-of-fact, and certainly didn't suggest some ethereal up-in-the-air hanging doubts about whether or not the person was enticed by, or was further worked up by anyone else. He claimed his guilt.
IF the verdict was "Guilty" and he hadn't commented - we could intimate that perhaps he might have been unfairly treated. But HE said he WAS guilty, so he wasn't unfairly treated.
There was no need for conjecture surrounding his activity, nor doubt about whether he should have been punished.
Have you got it now?
This thread was started on a message board where people discuss things. Posting a story on a message board inherently invites comments from other users of said massage board, however "matter of factly" something is posted. That was my thought process. I feel pretty confident it was normal.
There is no need, it is bleeding obvious from the way you post what sort of person you are - no really very hard to work out.
Then since you only interjected to aim a cheap barb at me and not contribute anything beyond that, you have got the responses you asked for. See ya.
Then why is it your business, cvnt?