Er, the same ones as you, but evidently with a tad more acumen?
Irony right?
Er, the same ones as you, but evidently with a tad more acumen?
This is the thrust of the title of the thread. If we are averaging 27/28 000 in the Champ, Shirley 19 games in the Prem would actually cost us more in lost revenue and increased player costs
This is the thrust of the title of the thread. If we are averaging 27/28 000 in the Champ, Shirley 19 games in the Prem would actually cost us more in lost revenue and increased player costs
This is the thrust of the title of the thread. If we are averaging 27/28 000 in the Champ, Shirley 19 games in the Prem would actually cost us more in lost revenue and increased player costs