sydney
tinky ****in winky
i presume they are on 4 or 5 k a week the rinsing , pony , irritating ***** ....for **** sake most of em are blind as bats .....VR can't come quick enough , this shit is costing people lots of money .
[Football] are we ever going to get a ref that can see better than me ...
- Thread starter sydney
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,286
Which thing are you complaining about in the first half which would have been fixed by VAR?
sydney
tinky ****in winky
- Thread starter
- #4
just bitching in general ....thought Muzzas disallowed goal was 50/50 at best he got to it without endangering the keeper , Montoya's yellow was questionable at best ....he got a lot of the ball .bit disappointed we didn't batter the keeper a bit more ....he was well suspect ...i'd be lumping on liverpool to do them about 5 -0 minimum
I don’t think he had it under control.
pork pie
New member
Their goal was offside. A player was clearing offside in the buildup and interfered with play.
- Jan 7, 2006
- 15,304
The ball was kicked out of his hands. Right decision.
Behave! Lacazette knew he was offside, made no attempt to play the ball as he knew he was offside. After 5/10 seconds, Bernardo’s attempted clearance hits Lacazette and then finds it way to Aubemyang. 100% goal.
- Apr 5, 2014
- 25,929
That granted, Murray stuck his knee up to stop him reaching it as it got to the line. May even have been a hand involved. Think we would have raging in a reverse situation.
portlock seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,778
Yep, correct decision. Maybe we could have scored from that corner shortly after that never was but the ref incorrectly gave us?!
Juan Albion
Chicken Sniffer 3rd Class
Not according to the experts on TV.
The ball hadn't been cleared upfield when he blocked the attempted clearance, so it was still in the first phase. Offside all day long.
Agree. 100% offside for me. Lost count of the amount of points we have potentially lost due to incorrect or, at the very least arguable, offside calls. I'd suggest with VAR overall this season we would perhaps have 3 or 4 extra points already.
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,286
Spot on with both points. Absolutely nothing wrong with their goal the way the offside law currently is written and Murray’s was so much a foul it’s laughable anyone would suggest otherwise.
maffew
Well-known member
This. In fact there were 2 or 3 fouls potentially to get that ball over the line, if it crossed it at all, I couldnt tell!! It would have been a dubious VAR in rugby
father_and_son
Well-known member
brightn'ove
cringe
Top salary for PL ref is £70k.
And their goal started with an off side interception.
Not bringing in VAR now is like not bringing in a vaccine for the common cold now because it may undermine the hanky industry.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct...aw19k_RLAHr41ql1m2VBsi_7&ust=1545959466990744
Gazwag
5 millionth post poster
So, in the same scenario the player was in an offside position from a though ball in the middle of the pitch which he didn't run towards and Ryan controlled the ball a yard outside of his box, the player then run towards Ryan, the clearance hit him and rebounded into the goal, would that have been allowed
blockhseagull
Well-known member
He became ‘active’ as soon as he blocked the clearance.