- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,772
Because you're being a stupid tw@t and not taking into that thick head of yours what you've been told .... i.e. you're wrong !!!
Agree with this that we are both currently and not planning to contravene any FPP rules and are therefor not cheats.
'Football morals' is a bit of a slippery slope though - He was entitled to go down - Taking one for the team etc etc
I agree, however I was commenting on those that are quick to criticise other football clubs whilst not being self criticle of a £20 million loss which has a similar dynamic than those contravening FFP rule's ( accepting the difference being that we are not ).
I agree, however I was commenting on those that are quick to criticise other football clubs whilst not being self criticle of a £20 million loss which has a similar dynamic than those contravening FFP rule's ( accepting the difference being that we are not ).
You revere him, I prefer not too.
Revere him? Did you really mean revere? Respect for him is a better way of phrasing it. Respecting his qualifications.
So by your logic, people who do 68 miles an hour in a 70 limit can't criticise people doing 90 because they are going fast and close to the limit?Someone gets it!! Hallelujah!
Just because you don't revere him, there's really no need to besmirch him.
Although we are not, by all accounts contravening FFP rule's, we are still using losses to fund our team and the clubs infrastructure, even if we all accept that those losses are reasonably covered, it's currently not a sustainable business model and it certainly doesnt make us any more 'football moral' than many others.
Agree with this that we are both currently and not planning to contravene any FPP rules and are therefor not cheats.
I agree, however I was commenting on those that are quick to criticise other football clubs whilst not being self criticle of a £20 million loss which has a similar dynamic than those contravening FFP rule's ( accepting the difference being that we are not ).
Someone gets it!! Hallelujah!
So by your logic, people who do 68 miles an hour in a 70 limit can't criticise people doing 90 because they are going fast and close to the limit?
Total losses in the Championship last season are set to be in the region of £300 million.
The problem arises due to the gulf in TV money between the PL and the Championship.
If clubs in the Championship ran a breakeven model it would allow small clubs in the PL (let us take Crystal Palace as an example) to cherry pick any player they wanted.
When Palace came in for Dunk this summer, the Albion responded by giving him a pay rise, which narrowed the gap between what the Croydon Hillbillies were prepared to pay him. We've done similar for other bids for players, but it does mean that clubs will run at a loss.
It's not an economic model that makes sense, unless you factor in the rewards of promotion, which are a minimum of £180 million.
Fully understand your point about morality, but there are lots of immoral issues in sport.
So by your logic, people who do 68 miles an hour in a 70 limit can't criticise people doing 90 because they are going fast and close to the limit?
I haven't abused, besmirched, revered or anything to anyone. I some times despair on people perspectives.
Idiot
I don't enjoy condescending twats like El Pres, almost sounds like Donald Trump
You really are the bigger idiot.
Nope, not abuse at all.
WTF are you on about?
Where will we be in Nov 2017 if we don't go up?
Possibly a reaction to your first post? I love drama queens.