London Calling
New member
Superphil said:Thanks for that Ed, as I thought, a little more to it than just 3mm.
I take the DDA seriously, as I said, part of my job is in the production of signage for DDA complaince, which covers everything from wheelchair route signage to signs designed for maximum legibility including Braille and tactile signs (used frequently in trains). I refer to the RNIB sign design guide for guidance, but in relation to the product we make, it is down to our experience and judgment as to what passes for "DDA compliant".
In the case of these trains it appears that the operator/owner has been negligent in its responsibility to make the trains suitable.
It comes as no suprise as, in the case of the signs, they cost a lot of money, clients rarely budget accordingly, and if they find out they have bought the wrong thing, they simply won't or can't buy the signs again.
Instances like this are beneficial to make organisations comply, but taking the trains out of service is the action of incompetent buffoons with little or no sense of priority.
The owners/operators should be taken to task and an example made of them. No point fining them, as that will lead to them justifying higher ticket prices, but the directors of the companies can be punished, and that is what must happen.
And to the fascists who posted check your facts b4 slagging off people who only want the same access to a service as you and I. And as Lb has also stated, providing access for disabled means better access for children, parents, the elderly. That is all of us at same point in our lives.
It is a disgrace that these "improvements" are only happening now. Disabled people haven't just materialised. Access to buildings, trains, buses, shops etc should have been established decades ago.
I just have no idea how mums for instance used to travel around with their young children, the London buses would have been a nightmare.
LC
Last edited: