Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] Are Crystal Palace the new Brighton?



Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,286
Back in Sussex
Playing well - check
Dominating games - check
Not scoring very many - check
Not winning very many - check
Drawing lots - check

Didn't they take the piss out of us for largely doing this, primarily because "none of that matters if you're not winning games"?
 




Quinney

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2009
3,658
Hastings
Playing well - check
Dominating games - check
Not scoring very many - check
Not winning very many - check
Drawing lots - check

Didn't they take the piss out of us for largely doing this, primarily because "none of that matters if you're not winning games"?

Letting it bounce - check


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
 


Munkfish

Well-known member
May 1, 2006
12,089
Annoyingly they look much better than I thought they would. Teams at our level need that bit of luck and palace had that in spades for the last couple under hodgson. They clearly deserve more this season but it’s not gone their way. Justice pie.
 




The Watford result won’t have exactly cheered them up either
 




Hamilton

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
12,953
Brighton
Playing well - check
Dominating games - check
Not scoring very many - check
Not winning very many - check
Drawing lots - check

Didn't they take the piss out of us for largely doing this, primarily because "none of that matters if you're not winning games"?

There is something very wrong about this thread title. You've made me feel quite unwell [MENTION=6886]Bozza[/MENTION]
 


AmexRuislip

Retired Spy 🕵️‍♂️
Feb 2, 2014
34,752
Ruislip
Playing well - check
Dominating games - check
Not scoring very many - check
Not winning very many - check
Drawing lots - check

Didn't they take the piss out of us for largely doing this, primarily because "none of that matters if you're not winning games"?

As long we are allowed to punch through the PL glass ceiling first.
 


dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
16,264
London
I got absolutely lambasted for saying this on another thread.

Palace look really good , I don't know how viera has done it?

They have also bought really well.

Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
 








DarrenFreemansPerm

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Sep 28, 2010
17,445
Shoreham
I got absolutely lambasted for saying this on another thread.

Palace look really good , I don't know how viera has done it?

They have also bought really well.


Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk

I think you’ve answered your own question there.
It also helps that they’ve shifted lots of old cloggers and actually attempt to win games.
 












Cheeky Monkey

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
23,868
Playing well - check
Dominating games - check
Not scoring very many - check
Not winning very many - check
Drawing lots - check

Didn't they take the piss out of us for largely doing this, primarily because "none of that matters if you're not winning games"?

Pretty much the exact comment made by one of theirs on the BBS yesterday. Xg et al.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,014
think it was hinted in MotD they are playing better without Zaha, which is amusing.
 


Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
They may not be winning but they are annoyingly better so far this season. I had no idea Viera would be able to pull off a change of style so easily. Long may their bad luck continue
 






Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,319
They’re certainly trying to copy some of our model… but they aren’t getting youngsters in and developing them like we did - it’s alway splurge money for instant ‘success’ as everyone knows.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here