Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 12,084
Another wow post.
The immigrants are required to fill the gaps we have NOW. the economic migrants who come to work in care, hospitals, and often low paid roles. This is an issue for the present day.
The issue with birth rates falling is the impact this will have in 20-30 years. We will need even more immigrants or a drastic change in life expectancy. If those immigrants that come here aged 35 then retire here we will be even more screwed.
I would not be shocked if in 20 years there is a serious discussion about how we reduce the burden on the state of caring for old people.
With the state expected to pay for older people’s care and transport, what else should they pay for? Holidays? It all feels so contradictory that some feel that selling a house to pay for you own care is unacceptable. As a 44 year old if i can’t afford something I will have to sell my home and pay for it. Why should older people not pay for something they need? I genuinely don’t understand.
The burden on the NHS from an ageing population is something that needs to be addressed.
The assumption that every person needing care,has a saleable asset that will cover those costs, is wrong.
This may be the case for a percentage of "boomers" in the South of England, but will increasingly not be true of the majority of people in need of care.