There's not been any real show against Hyypia at all yet.
Would there be many other clubs, with the expectation levels we have, who would be so quiet at games in relation to their thoughts about the manager?
Supporting the team at games is, of course, absolutely the right thing to do, but by now I would have expected more dissent towards Hyypia to have been put into the mix. It raises the stakes considerably because it's difficult for an owner/board to ignore or gloss over, particularly when it becomes a focal point for match reports in the media, which it generally does.
Are we too nice? Maybe we're just very patient.
At what point would significant vocal opposition to Hyypia's tenure become to be a feature at games?
Would there be many other clubs, with the expectation levels we have, who would be so quiet at games in relation to their thoughts about the manager?
Supporting the team at games is, of course, absolutely the right thing to do, but by now I would have expected more dissent towards Hyypia to have been put into the mix. It raises the stakes considerably because it's difficult for an owner/board to ignore or gloss over, particularly when it becomes a focal point for match reports in the media, which it generally does.
Are we too nice? Maybe we're just very patient.
At what point would significant vocal opposition to Hyypia's tenure become to be a feature at games?