thejackal
Throbbing Member
Hi Jackal, all that is ancient history and hardly relevant to the views held today.
A bit of an aside and a little bit off track, but my late father was a GP who set up practice in 1947, the year before the NHS was formed and he recalled that there was huge suspicion and wariness amongst established medics at the time as to how the NHS would affect their earnings. As a young doctor with no assets,he wasn't so concerned and set up a very successful practice, fully embracing the 'new system'. After negotiations took place between the Government and the doctors (led by a Dr.Cameron!) , peace broke out and the NHS went from strength to strength.
You mention aspiration a couple of times and I think that is very important. There will always be those who would never vote Tory or would never vote Labour, but I think that the Tories tapped into a feeling of 'I can do this' attitude amongst, perhaps, some of the younger working class, who were less 'dyed in the wool' Labour voters and who didn't necessarily think in the same way that their parents and grandparents had. They were less accepting of the way things had always been and more inclined to want more , such as owning their own house. Call this aspiration, if you like and it is no bad thing. Of course, they were living in less harsh times than their forbears were and the Labour Party had fought well and hard to raise the standard of living for the working class for a long time.
I don't go along with the jingoism and desperate hope thing ,at all.
What I do think, is that plenty of working class voters feel that the present Labour Party no longer represents them, and as a journalist put it recently, is no longer the party of the working class , but is the party of the 'smirking class'; those members of the so called metropolitan elite, who believe they know best and whilst lecturing everybody else about equality etc. carry on regardless living their comfortable hypocritical lives, well insulated from the riff-raff of the working classes, they pretend they have so much in common with.
Hello Mr. F.
You make some good points.
History, yes, but history is always relevant, imo. If we paid more attention to history then we probably wouldn't be in the mess we're in now, e.g. in regard to the rise of the far right or invading Iraq again (did you know that we built the barracks in Basra a hundred years ago? We'll never learn.)
I am painfully aware of the BMA's opposition to the NHS. They thought it would devalue a doctor's position in society. Fair play to them for coming on board in the end.
I accept that aspiration is a good thing, but to aspire to be better at the expense of everyone else? That's the very essence of Conservatism.
I would love for everyone to be able to own their own home, I only own part of mine. But the Tories sold off the council houses for jack sh*t and didn't build any more. Not particularly helpful for future generations of poor people.
I definitely agree with your point about the 'smirking class', although I would counter that it applies much more to 'New Labour', Bliar and Brown than to the lefties who inhabit the party now.
I genuinely think the latest Labour lot aren't in it for themselves, whereas the likes of Johnson and Berk (the richest member of the cabinet) are so obviously on the take, it's comical.
Have a look at Corbyn's expenses claims, consistently the lowest in parliament. Compare that to Johnson claiming £16.50 for a remembrance day wreath. That is not the example to set, whoever you are.