Stinky Kat
Tripping
Why is it an awful statement - because its true. Saint Dick wants to balance the books, nothing wrong with that.
Lammy said:I'm sorry but we must have a fair bit of cash for players buy now. Since selling Zamora we've seen precious little invested back into the playing side.
We've sold
Zamora
Harding
Currie
Cullip
Knight
Virgo
That probably about £5m worth.
Not to mention
Playoff money
Spurs away money
New home strip money
Coca Cola money
probably worth about £2.5m
That's £7.5m
I no longer accept the excuse that Falmer is eating all our profits. The Judicial Review is not costing the club much money in terms of real outlay. Yes it is delaying us getting to a more profitable situation but it is no longer COSTING us much. Also let's take into account the wages we're saving. We're currently playing with a fair number of youth team players. I can't imagine they're on much. So we have this money for say, taking over contracts.
It's all bullshit and I have to say that not only have I lost faith in McGhee I'm starting to lose faith in Knight too!! I never thought I'd say that either!
samparish said:I think you've overestimated the income somewhat
Lammy said:Really? Where?
Lammy said:Really? Where?
Race said:Why is that worrying?
samparish said:Zamora - £1m when you take into account the 30% we had to give to Bristol Rovers
Harding - will eventually be £800,000
Currie - £250,000
Cullip - £250,000
Knight - that pitiful £125,000, half of which went to Chelsea
Virgo - £1.5m
That equals a little under £4m, not the £5m you suggest.
Also, there is NO WAY the playoff money, Spurs money and money from home shirts makes another £2.5m as you suggest. The Coke money is irrelevant as that was ringfenced and has gone entirely on CKR's transfer fee and wages as per the rules of the competition.
Albion Rob said:Because I'd be very surprised if we could sign someone for less than that who is going to be any better than what we have, which sadly isn't working.
Also, £3.5k basic, what's that, about £180,000 per year. Maybe plus bonuses you could argue £210,000. That seems like a reasonable amount for a player who may have jept us up this season and would certainly have a good chance of firing us to promotion next season.
blockhseagull said:But we had a huge shortfall of cash and needed 3m this time last season.....so thats where it has gone
Race said:£3.5 basic may seem reasonable for a decent player, and you're probably right that someone decent isnt going to sign for less than that, but the bottom line is there isnt that kind of money to throw around. I laugh when I read on here some of the figures that are mentioned our players are on! I'm not claiming I know exactly but I'm sure some wouldnt believe me even if I did!
tinx said:This just sounds like bullsht, Dick Knight says there is funds available and players don't want to come becasue of withdean then when someone is available and wants to come and fits the profile he says we can't afford it. So which is it?
Looks like the marketing man is spreading marketing bullshit around to me
Easy 10 said:Its fairly telling that 12 youth players were given contracts this month. Yes they've done fantastically well in the Youth Cup this year, but putting so many kids onto professional contracts in one fell swoop is probably indicative that we will be relying on them more than experienced signings in the coming seasons.
Now I'm all for youth being given a chance, and we've reaped the rewards from the likes of Virgo and Harding (at least financially). But there has to be a balance of youth, experience, and some quality signings. Now they're on professional contracts, I'm concerned that next season we could see a flood of youth teamers put into the first team who simply arn't ready. Gatting is a case in point - having been thrown into McGhee's constantly-changing cement mixer of strikers up front, he's had half a dozen games, struggled to make any impact, and now he's back on the bench. He's not ready - thats not his fault, but I don't think it's doing him any good whatsoever.
If this seasons loan/transfer window is anything to go by then next season is going to be no better, and if we do end up relying on our kids, then talk of being ni the promotion shake-up is just fanciful.
They'll sink without a trace IN the shop window if they're cast into the team for League One football next season. The likes of Dean Wilkins and Mark McGhee are obviously well aware of the dangers of playing too many young players in the first team too soon, they don't need anyone on here to tell them that. But we're now getting to a stage whereby because we can't actually sign anyone (for whatever reason, take your pick), we're not going to be left with any CHOICE but to plunder the youth team just to get an XI out there on the pitch.Lammy said:The trouble is Easy, Our Youth players aren't in the shop window when they are playing for the Youth team.
Race said:Whatever. I wouldnt necessarily believe anything he would have to say, unless hes actually seen his contract that is which I doubt very much, and I know our bank manager wouldnt have a clue.