[tweet]528168109991944194[/tweet]
[tweet]528169597158301696[/tweet]
[tweet]528169597158301696[/tweet]
It would depend on a lot of things, I suppose (not least the budget aspect), but generally I think that as long as I had one GK to play and one to sit on the bench, I'd be OK with that. As for the U21s, either Walton or Kasper could play with the other on the bench, and then reverse the roles for Wigan on Tuesday.Would you take a risk as manager, allowing for the fact that the U21s have a game on Monday night, and the other youth keeper is suspended following a red card?
I don't know, but isn't there some sort of injury insurance?
Good keeper but I'm a bit confused, stockdale has put on twitter that he hopes to train later today to test the finger. I would take that as he is not far from fitness and with us playing Wigan on Tuesday are we bringing him in for one game?
Cruel.
We have a goalkeeping gap and they sign a world-class player.
We have a goalscoring problem and we've signed a bloke from Barnsley.
It will be interesting if Stockdale's fit but Al Habsi plays anyway..............
Good keeper but I'm a bit confused, stockdale has put on twitter that he hopes to train later today to test the finger. I would take that as he is not far from fitness and with us playing Wigan on Tuesday are we bringing him in for one game?
It will be interesting if Stockdale's fit but Al Habsi plays anyway..............
[tweet]528148682512666625[/tweet]
[tweet]528148682512666625[/tweet]
Can't really see any objections to this myself. A match day combination of Walton & Al Habsi for the next month or so will do me fine.
Those moaning about it seem to think a striker and a goalkeeper are mutually exclusive. I really don't think it's a case of "we've picked up a cheap goalkeeper for a month so we can't sign a striker". Why on earth would any club (yes, even ours) operate like that?