Lokki 7
WSU
oday is the worst day in the World markets for 150 years. Even worse than the Wall Street crash which Lehmann survived.
No it's not. FTSE down less than 5%. Bad, but not the worst by some way.
oday is the worst day in the World markets for 150 years. Even worse than the Wall Street crash which Lehmann survived.
I think that so called stability was forced and is the equivalent of keeping someone alive on a life support machine, I think the world is about to change and us with it!HBOS going under would be a catastrophy for the mortgage market but their market share has fallen from 25% last year to less than 7& this year and they have recently shut down The Mortgage Business company so nothing would suprise me at the moment.
The 2 US banks going bust have added 6 months onto the credit crunch here and totally destablised a market showing the first signs of stability.
The CBI are forecasting a "shallow recession" but they are saying it WILL NOT be as bad as the one we suffered in the 90's
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20080914/tuk-britain-economy-business-a7ad41d.html
.... he asked me if I had bought a Barratt or Wimpey home in the last 12 mnths.
I said no - and he said good for you. if you ahve I suggest you go home tonight, pack up and get the f*** out.
The government would be forced to take on the debt and nationlise it like the US government have done with Lehmann.
Oh, and the US Govt has washed it's hands of Lehmans and is not getting involved.
(Bet you're glad to have me back Unc.)
lucky you can access the internet from starbucks eh?
why would a house purchased from one of these companies be at any risk? sounds like too many 'beaters.
I thought your house was owned by the bank until you pay off your mortgage.I doubt very much the Government will nationalise another bank. What if there were no buyers as was the case for Lehmans ?
Don't take it out on me Kent boy. Not my fault your firm can no longer afford City rates.
Oh, and the US Govt has washed it's hands of Lehmans and is not getting involved.
(Bet you're glad to have me back Unc.)
Sorry I was thinking of Merrill Lynch.
I thought your house was owned by the bank until you pay off your mortgage.
If that's true, then when the bank goes bust and its creditors come knocking, they are entitled to liquidate the bank's assets to recoup the money. That could mean selling your house for you.
This may be wrong, but isn't that how it normally works? And Lokki is spot on when he say the US govt is washing their hands of Lehmans. They won't be bailing out wall street this time.
Sounds plausable, forcing you to pay back what you owe, and ending the mortgage agreement to pay off the creditors. So if one of the big lenders over here went bust, would it really force thousands of people to move, or could they just look to remortgage, assuming that they didnt have negative equity of course!
The mortgage book would be bought by another bank but the business itself would not. So the mortgages would move to another provider but the debts of the business would remain with the company.
This would mean the householder would have a new provider and new terms at the end of the mortgage agreement.
People would not be kicked out of their houses, but they may find that when their term expires they get very unfavourable terms on the re-mortgage.
People would not be kicked out of their houses, but they may find that when their term expires they get very unfavourable terms on the re-mortgage.