It was rocking, right from the start, never seen it that good.
It was rocking, right from the start, never seen it that good.
IMO he does a good job and reports what has happened. Just because he does not report the self congratulatory wankathon about the singing does not make him a bad reporter. It was a mediocre match, but because we won that is quickly forgotten by us and rightly so.
I have it on good authority that Andy Naylor and the Argus are no longer given "preferential" treatment as they were in years gone by. This is for various reasons, but mainly because the club don't want stories leaked by Argus "insiders" anymore.
When Poyet took charge, the club lost out on a few players due to "leaks" at the Argus and it's because of this, The Argus will know no more than any other media source.
Sent from my iPhone using a goat
Why was it it that Andy Naylor couldn't convey any of the excitement and atmosphere that the crowd generated on saturday. I thought it was brilliant. Come on Andy give us fans some credit.
the write at one pace naylor who thinks he is writing scripts for the bbc world service? snoooze.
He was upset on Twitter today because someone was taking his scoops before he could get them online.
Because he'd rather wait for the first time the crowd groans at a backward pass and then write 500 words about how we should remember where we came from and should appreciate what we've got. I know it's fashionable to dislike the man but I genuinely do, with a passion. Has a chip on his shoulder about Albion support and needs to f*** off back to Stoke- Brian Owen is 10x a better journo than him anyway.
To be fair it is only a few who don't like him, but they do make their opinions known! I think El Pres had it right, some people would prefer to read a match report along the lines of "Chant after chant rolled from the stands as the best fans in Britain showed why the Amex is rated as one the top stadiums in the world for atmosphere. Song after song pounded down onto the opposition players until they covered their ears and screamed for mercy whilst desperately signalling to their own mute fans to try and do something to counter the immense wall of blue and white noise ..."I get it. This forum doesn't like Andy Naylor, but dear God get a grip! Sure, he hasn't lavished praise on us for getting behind our team more vociferously than normal but why should he?
Its not his fault we've only really had three or four home games (Burnley, Newcastle, Donny and Liverpool) this season with a massive atmosphere is it?
Do we really need a pat on the back from the local rag every time we make some noise?
To be fair it is only a few who don't like him, but they do make their opinions known! I think El Pres had it right, some people would prefer to read a match report along the lines of "Chant after chant rolled from the stands as the best fans in Britain showed why the Amex is rated as one the top stadiums in the world for atmosphere. Song after song pounded down onto the opposition players until they covered their ears and screamed for mercy whilst desperately signalling to their own mute fans to try and do something to counter the immense wall of blue and white noise ..."
Spot on - nothing wrong with Naylor, IMO. There really are some f***ing tools on here.IMO he does a good job and reports what has happened. Just because he does not report the self congratulatory wankathon about the singing does not make him a bad reporter. It was a mediocre match, but because we won that is quickly forgotten by us and rightly so.
IMO he does a good job and reports what has happened. Just because he does not report the self congratulatory wankathon about the singing does not make him a bad reporter. It was a mediocre match, but because we won that is quickly forgotten by us and rightly so.