- Jun 27, 2012
- 14,678
He did:
And then ...
He did:
He likes to troll Brighton fans to spark activity on his Twitter.And then ...
At first he did. And then, having seen the replay/different angle said . "Yes they did" to the question - Have Villa "got away with it ?" having seen the Sky clip that they shared on twitter. And said VAR should have sent the ref to the monitor - ie: give the penalty.He also said this which doesn’t quite tie in with what you’ve said
“Wouldn't say it was clear and obvious and, as the ref didn't give it, I'm not surprised the decision stood after VAR check.”
Ridiculous. I saw it in real time from the East Stand Upper - didn't look like a penalty to me. I've now seen that angle and think it was. Am i trolling fans or just honestly reporting what i think.He likes to troll Brighton fans to spark activity on his Twitter.
This time he realised he'd gone too far and made himself look silly so he had to back track.
You didn't have access to the replays.Ridiculous. I saw it in real time from the East Stand Upper - didn't look like a penalty to me. I've now seen that angle and think it was. Am i trolling fans or just honestly reporting what i think.
If , by wrong, you mean he changed his mind on seeing more angles/footage. Then. He did.Just admit you were wrong, it’s not that embarrassing is it?
He literally saw a different replay and said having now seen that - tweeted immediately VAR should have given it. .You didn't have access to the replays.
Any replay he saw showed a stonewall penalty. Stop digging.He literally saw a different replay and said having now seen that - tweeted immediately VAR should have given it. .
YesAre some people simply not happy if they don't have someone/something to moan about or hold a grudge against?
I think this is why I struggle with social media. Ultimately I don't CARE about such inane things such as what a journalist has or hasn't written (or even posted on Twitter) – or the way it could be interpreted. What difference does it REALLY make to your life, apart from seemingly annoying you? Life's too short for that kind of shit.
Maybe I'm the odd one?
Yes i saw the earlier tweet where he thought it wasnt a penalty ….and then changed his mind after seeing replays (fair enough)..saying VAR should have given it but understanding why not (pffft to that one)…he seems to have covered all the no but yes but maybe anglesAt first he did. And then, having seen the replay/different angle said . "Yes they did" to the question - Have Villa "got away with it ?" having seen the Sky clip that they shared on twitter. And said VAR should have sent the ref to the monitor - ie: give the penalty.
I dunno, because he's from Brighton, grew up in Brighton, lives in Brighton and makes his living off the club?'The guy has zero allegiance to the Albion.'
Why should he?
I was directing that comment at Greg Bobkin not Naylor and yes he did admit he's changed his mindIf , by wrong, you mean he changed his mind on seeing more angles/footage. Then. He did.
He saw a replay - the Sky angle via Twitter - and said he now agreed VAR should have sent the ref to the monitor. Hence agreed, like you , that it was a penalty. Perhaps a stonewall one. What is it about that , that you're still upset about ?Any replay he saw showed a stonewall penalty. Stop digging.
I'm not upset about it, never was.He saw a replay - the Sky angle via Twitter - and said he now agreed VAR should have sent the ref to the monitor. Hence agreed, like you , that it was a penalty. Perhaps a stonewall one. What is it about that , that you're still upset about ?
Ridiculous. I saw it in real time from the East Stand Upper - didn't look like a penalty to me. I've now seen that angle and think it was. Am i trolling fans or just honestly reporting what i think.
What is it about Brighton fans being pissed off that Naylor jumped straight in, knowing a replay was coming in seconds, stating it wasn’t a penalty that makes you keep defending him and knocking them? He should have waited 30 secs, as it is he made a fool of himself by thinking he didn’t need to see it again before twattering.He saw a replay - the Sky angle via Twitter - and said he now agreed VAR should have sent the ref to the monitor. Hence agreed, like you , that it was a penalty. Perhaps a stonewall one. What is it about that , that you're still upset about ?
What is it about Brighton fans being pissed off that Naylor jumped straight in, knowing a replay was coming in seconds, stating it wasn’t a penalty that makes you keep defending him and knocking them? He should have waited 30 secs, as it is he made a fool of himself by thinking he didn’t need to see it again before twattering.
He was called out and it seems you object to that
It does seem that Naylor may have been blinded by “a total eclipse of the sun”You know your music Icy - Does “I bet you think this tweet is about you” come to mind here…