GingerBeerMan
3-0
- Dec 29, 2011
- 8,205
Andy Naylor
This. Except the middle line as I wasn't as Yeovil.
I wonder how this came through David Burke's SWAT analysis? "Hmm, we need a striker. However here is a winger with a private business and a pregnant wife who we'll have to move to the other side of the UK. Perfect."
I'm starting to suspect the SW in SWAT stands for South Wales.
Not the first time sure it wont be the last time who gives a sht what that Argus thinks.
Stopped getting the paper when they were first to name the four players in the then the alleged sex assault.
However, Naylor really is talking a load of nonsense. He can't on the one hand say that we (the keyboard warriors) ought to take account of some aspects of Conway's off-pitch circumstances (house move, baby etc) and give him the benefit of the doubt because of them, but on the other hand expect us to ignore his other extra-curricular activities (e.g. his dodgy-sounding pyramid sales business for 'nutritional supplements') on which, to judge by his twitter feed, he seems to spend a disproportionate amount of time and energy -- what on earth is a well-paid footballer doing getting involved with one of these sad 'get rich, quick' schemes? On that, I think the NSC critique is entirely justified.
SWOT.
I think people are sometimes a little too harsh on Andy Naylor. He has a fairly tough job finding a back page lead every day and to fill space inside the paper as well. Law of averages says some of these won't be hard news and appear a little tame. Equally, some stories will show an opinion many on here disagree with. There won't be massive Albion-related news every day of the week.
However, I do sometimes struggle with this idea of "keyboard detractors" as something of a separate, irrational, supporting sub group. The fact someone is sharing an opinion on NSC or wherever does not make it somehow less valid, which sometimes seems to be the insinuation from some areas of the printed press.
And in this instance, I don't think an hour of average football away to the worst Championship team I have ever seen during which Conway created at best a couple of chances can really be seen to silence any of his critics - online or otherwise.
Also, as was pointed out earlier in the thread, I think for "extremists" you could probably just put "people who spent a lot of money and time travelling to Yeovil to watch a pretty shit performance and were rightly disappointed..."
Besides, how well did he REALLY play? No goals, no assists... Hardly silencing.
This is the bit I don't get from Burke's Roar interview.If we sign someone on loan then they should be fit and ready to play and not have a load of baggage with them, makes you wonder why we went for him if it was going to take half of his loan spell to get him right
http://www.theargus.co.uk/sport/10755398.Albion_winger_silences_keyboard_critics/
Reference to NSC maybe?
That story is bullsh*t on so many levels.
Hand on heart, I would cut my left bollock off to play football for a living for the amount of money Conway is earning.
Me?
His performances so far have been a throwback to when we had abysmal players at the Withdean. If he fancies picking it up a bit, great. Not asking too much either.
In fairness to Conway - who hasn't impressed me at all so far - he has hardly played. Very difficult to judge on the basis of five games, two of which he started on the bench, in a team generally struggling a little to find its feet. One of his games also came away to the team expected to walk this division with a defence which gives up very little.
Expected more from him though. I think that is fair to say.
Part of me feels sorry for Solly March who impressed in pre-season but hasn't got a go yet. With Lua Lua now out I think we did need to get a wide player in on loan. Not quite so sure that was the case when we signed Conway.
If money is as tight as it seems to be, I don't think many would have complained had March been used off the bench or in the odd game in the same way Ince has been in absence of Bridcutt.