It's time Mr Owen got the top job at the Argus. A better journalist with a finer use of words.
Spot on
The criticism (which, in fact, amounts to nothing more than abuse) of Andy Naylor puzzles me. I've read local newspaper reporters' coverage of football on any number of clubs in England during my fifty years of involvement in professional football, and would place Naylor in the top 10% of that group (totalling more than eighty). Why do I rank him in that way? 1: He is careful in accurately sourcing his information; 2: He is, notwithstanding his curious fondness for Stoke City, committed to the Albion; 3: Providing a good service to Albion fans is for him a matter of professional pride.
My opinions count for no more than anyone else's. In any case, some others on this site have more experience of professional football and /or of journalism than I have. But it would be interesting to know if those who think Naylor a poor journalist have reasons for their views.
For the record, I do not know Mr. Naylor. I have neither met him nor corresponded with him.
And your opinion of Brian Owen is?
Naylor's tweets will still show on your feed, if searching #bhafc hashtag.. just a guess, but as he's a journo, 50% of posts are done to get a reaction, and boost his deluded self imprtance.
He is paid to watch and report on our games on a Saturday not watch premiership updates !!
It would be like someone working for Asda but keeping and eye on the doors at Tesco's all the time they are there
And no I won't follow the knob anymore
Andy Naylor is a prick! We all know that anyway.
I will enjoy the day he leaves the Argus and they appoint an Albion fan.
Hopefully Liverpool smash Stoke today!
The criticism (which, in fact, amounts to nothing more than abuse) of Andy Naylor puzzles me. I've read local newspaper reporters' coverage of football on any number of clubs in England during my fifty years of involvement in professional football, and would place Naylor in the top 10% of that group (totalling more than eighty). Why do I rank him in that way? 1: He is careful in accurately sourcing his information; 2: He is, notwithstanding his curious fondness for Stoke City, committed to the Albion; 3: Providing a good service to Albion fans is for him a matter of professional pride.
My opinions count for no more than anyone else's. In any case, some others on this site have more experience of professional football and /or of journalism than I have. But it would be interesting to know if those who think Naylor a poor journalist have reasons for their views.
For the record, I do not know Mr. Naylor. I have neither met him nor corresponded with him.
Why do you specifically want a Brighton fan to report on Brighton games?
I'd rather read a report from someone with a slightly emotionally-detached perspective, even if I don't agree with it.