Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Andy Murray



Mar 29, 2010
2,492
Under your skin.
i see him loseing in 5 sets

Won it in 4. True BRIT. :clap:

meg.jpg


Mystic Mark... :clap:
 




Barrel of Fun

Abort, retry, fail














Tricky Dicky

New member
Jul 27, 2004
13,558
Sunny Shoreham
Andy Murray's got more bottle than every English sportsman from the last eight million years put together. Factomundo.

He struggled in his earlier years with fitness and problems after his body grew so much in his latter teen years, so when people first started to see him regularly, he had issues - he is not the natural athelete that, say, Rafa, is. Since he started a strict and dedicated training regime a couple of years ago, he is now one of the fittest and fastest players on the mens circuit. Of course, some people just hate him for the sake of it or for an offhand joke comment about English football.
 






Marshy

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
19,955
FRUIT OF THE BLOOM
Murray to win Wimbledon and England to win the World Cup what odds could you get on that ?
 


We're the Stripes

Well-known member
Jul 31, 2005
3,591
BN2
He can have as much bottle as he wants, (not that I agree with the above statement), but he will just never be in the same league as Federer or Nadal.
So? Is that enough to suggest he'll never win a Grand Slam? (I know you haven't stated it, but can tell you probably believe it).

Federer is nearly 29, Murray is 23. Clearly Andy is going to have many years of playing without having to worry about meeting Fed in the latter stages of a Grand Slam. Nadal, Murray has already proven himself against on the big stage - US Open semi-final '08 & Aussie Open QFs last year, albeit with Nadal dropping out in the 3rd set. He may not have the same winning mentality as the two at this moment in time, but he's already done enough in his career to prove he can cause some real damage in the Grand Slams.

It's strange how a lot of Brits seem to treat Murray due to his slight inferiority to probably two of the greatest tennis phenomenons to have walked our planet. Not a fair comparison to make when judging his ability, he's still a sensational player - consistently competing right at the top of the game.
 






Tricky Dicky

New member
Jul 27, 2004
13,558
Sunny Shoreham
So? Is that enough to suggest he'll never win a Grand Slam? (I know you haven't stated it, but can tell you probably believe it).

Federer is nearly 29, Murray is 23. Clearly Andy is going to have many years of playing without having to worry about meeting Fed in the latter stages of a Grand Slam. Nadal, Murray has already proven himself against on the big stage - US Open semi-final '08 & Aussie Open QFs last year, albeit with Nadal dropping out in the 3rd set. He may not have the same winning mentality as the two at this moment in time, but he's already done enough in his career to prove he can cause some real damage in the Grand Slams.

It's strange how a lot of Brits seem to treat Murray due to his often slight inferiority to probably two of the greatest tennis phenomenons to have walked our planet. Not a fair comparison to make when judging his ability, he's still a sensational player - consistently competing right at the top of the game.


I think he will win one of the slams, possibly several, but once Fed goes, the array a talent at the top of the mens game to the moment is quite awesome - I would guess stronger than it's ever been. Any of the current top 10 could win a slam on the right day. It's not going to get any easier for Murray methinks.
 


We're the Stripes

Well-known member
Jul 31, 2005
3,591
BN2
Just got to hope that 'right day' comes more often for Murray than it does the others!
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here