Originunknown
BINFEST'ING
Brighton forward Florin Andone has been charged with violent conduct after appearing to elbow West Brom's Sam Field in Wednesday's FA Cup fourth round replay.
Not sure why you should get penalised just because a match is on TV. How is that fair. It should be down to what the ref sees on the day and not all this retrospective rubbish. Maybe they should replay TV matches if it’s proved the ref missed a stonewall penaly or something similar.
All our games are on TV at the moment
Also what is the criteria for deciding if it should be subject to a ban as it seems to me it only becomes an issue if the Studio pundits decide to discuss it. Does there have to be a formal complaint or something?
Puts us in the shite with good old muzza. And locadia to carry us through
When would the ban start ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Also what is the criteria for deciding if it should be subject to a ban as it seems to me it only becomes an issue if the Studio pundits decide to discuss it. Does there have to be a formal complaint or something?
Odd that we gave him the no 9 shirt if he’s a winger. How much time has he had as a main striker with March/AK/Ali J as the wingers? I may be wrong but I was under the impression that he was bought as a striker rather than a winger. Thought he did quite well against Watford too.
Has anyone ever seen a referee's report. What is it - is it a blow-by-blow account of the 90 minutes as far as he can remember. Or just an account of bookings, sending-off's, goals, and so on. For instance, last night's incident, would he put something like 'coming together of a few players in front of me - didn't see anything wrong'? Surely not, because there will be a hundred incidents where he 'didn't see anything wrong'. If he wrote 'Andone, possible elbow - okay in my view', fair enough - but merely not mentioning something doesn't mean he didn't see it. I don't mention every car I pass on the way home - because it's normal. Are they lengthy? And so on. I'd be interested to know if anyone does know.
I've had a look online, but the only guidance I can find is 'misconduct reports', and obviously if the ref thinks there was no misconduct, he won't mention it. Which strikes me as a bit of a circular argument really - and the only way a ban could be avoided would be if the ref did see something and awarded a free kick or yellow card or something. But even if he awarded a free-kick, I doubt if he'd remember after the match all the reasons why.
Pity the ref didnt see it and give him a yellow card
Odd that we gave him the no 9 shirt if he’s a winger. How much time has he had as a main striker with March/AK/Ali J as the wingers? I may be wrong but I was under the impression that he was bought as a striker rather than a winger. Thought he did quite well against Watford too.
I didn’t say that he was a winger.
In my mind, there are 5 positions in Attack, Midfield and Defence but clearly a manager can only pick 10 of those positions from a possible 15.
This is how I view the attacking positions.
Winger - Forward - Striker - Forward - Winger
On this basis - AJ & Locadia were both mainly playing as ‘Forwards’ in Dutch 4-4-3s.
However I agree with CH that AJ is also a winger and that Locadia can play Striker or ‘number 9’.
We bought Locadia in as a number 9 when CH did not play a front three so you are right but he has looked so much better as a ‘forward’ (not a winger as he does not provide defensive cover like a March or Knocky).