When are you going to run the proper story about why Dean Wilkins was sacked? That would actually be worth reading, and would enlighten the 95% of fans who haven't got a clue why.
Plus there are many other "activists" around who never crave as much attention.
You were certainly craving attention the last time we met under the Palace Pier
Yawn all f***ing round. Good job it's bed time. Two people with inflated egos of themselves having a pathetic spat in public. Who gives a monkeys. 3 points on Saturday is all that matters. Atilla you voiced your opinion, and Naylor is entitled to voice his own. He writes about Brighton and what is going on at the club. That's his job. He does his job. You do yours. Get over it.
Violent virgin vigilante verging on the vindictive.
The board thought (and continue to think) that Dean Wilkins is an excellent coach, but lacked some of the skills required to be the first team manager. They therefore replaced him with Micky Adams, and asked Dean to revert to the role where his skills are best employed.
Question answered.
Since the Argus is read by many more thousands of people than visit NSC, all that a "quiet word with Mr Naylor" would achieve is that those thousands of people might still think that Attila's behaviour was inappropriate - because the Argus had told them so and no-one had challenged that view.
Yawn all f***ing round. Good job it's bed time. Two people with inflated egos of themselves having a pathetic spat in public. Who gives a monkeys. 3 points on Saturday is all that matters. Atilla you voiced your opinion, and Naylor is entitled to voice his own. He writes about Brighton and what is going on at the club. That's his job. He does his job. You do yours. Get over it.
I think John has put that extremely well. Especially the bit about
"that’s why I, along with many others, have been so disappointed at recent events. I really want Micky to turn things round and ultimately lead us out at Falmer. But no one is above criticism,"
Exactly! My criticisms of how Wilkins was treated, and subsequently the way the team has (under)performed this season doesn't make me disloyal, and I'm sick of the holier than thou attitude taken by some towards those who are critical.
We all want the Albion to succeed, and the criticism we throw out is because we care, and surely that is a good thing. Of course some take things too far and are too quick to sway their opinions one way or the other, but that's not what we are talking about here. John, and many others of us who are critical right now, LOVE this club dearly and it hurts like hell to see us struggle, especially when success seemed to be so close, either by having Wilkins continue the progress we were seeing, or by having the Micky of old in charge. Either seemed to be a recipe for success, and somehow we have got neither at the moment.
Of course we are frustrated by that, but if as fans we are not allowed to get passionate and vent our opinions, then football is dead for me, as it's all about passion and opinions.
It does all make us look a bit small-time though. Albion fans currently seem obsessed with the 'personalities' around the club rather than the football and the club itself.
The board thought (and continue to think) that Dean Wilkins is an excellent coach, but lacked some of the skills required to be the first team manager. They therefore replaced him with Micky Adams, and asked Dean to revert to the role where his skills are best employed.
Question answered.