I'm sure when I was younger we were told not to use the word 'black' but to use 'coloured' instead
We devalue the real fight against the evil of racism if we continue to vilify people who, with all good intent (and her point was that abuse of women and black women in particular is heinous), use the wrong word. It's not a word we use nowadays, it can be offensive to some, she's said sorry and maybe that will stop others saying it. That's the end of it for me.
Not 'white' maybe, but 'whitey' certainly has. As has 'honky'; no prosecutions or outrage about that though.
Funny that.
Exactly that. Same here.
Black was a racist term term when I was young, and coloured was the pc thing to say.
I remember after being abroad for a good few years, coming back and innocently mentioning to mates something about a coloured person and the look of disgust I got from them.
I honestly had no idea that the pc term for that had changed and was quite shocked / embarresed / confused....
Exactly this! It's not what you say it's how you say it. Far more important is how you actually treat people. I'm probably seen as an old fart who isn't particularly politically correct at times, but I've always tried to treat everyone fairly and not judge by appearance.Exactly that. Same here.
Black was a racist term term when I was young, and coloured was the pc thing to say.
I remember after being abroad for a good few years, coming back and innocently mentioning to mates something about a coloured person and the look of disgust I got from them.
I honestly had no idea that the pc term for that had changed and was quite shocked / embarresed / confused....
I would agree if it were almost any other profession other than a politician.
It is literally her job to represent the public. It's her job to be mindful of the things she is saying. If she is using a racist term publicly then she is not fit to do her job, simple as that.
But most concerning for me is that it is likely a fruedian slip, as she will know full well that it is a racist term, and uses it anyway. It is also likely to offer an insight into the kind of company she keeps where it acceptable to use this kind of language.
Sorry, who is hounding her? She said it on the BBC, they've reported it, it's not made any front page, or main page news outlet sites I use any road. Rudd apologised herself, can't see any calls for her to resign, or anything like that. I'm struggling to see where the hounding is?
Hounded might have been too strong a word but certainly it has put a lot of people's attention on one word when what she was actually saying about abuse was what really mattered. I know the word can cause offence but I think Diane Abbot could probably have won some high ground by saying something like 'Amber dear we are all coloured, I am brown and you are some strange shade of pink'
Yes, because the race of someone we're addressing is not usually the important bit. In your example we'd say 'No, not the woman with the jacket, the woman with the glasses next to her', rather than say what race they are. That's not relevant to Amber's point, as she was intending to stand up for woman from ethnic minorities. Her mistake was to say coloured woman, instead of black woman, or woman of colour.
I wouldn't say 'coloured woman', because I've grown up in a society that deems that term to be offensive, but there are other cultures where it's not offensive. I don't know if Amber has mixed with other cultures and accidentally assumed that the term is considered acceptable here, or what.
I'm usually pretty sensitive about these things, and quick to condemn - but in this case I agree that Amber Rudd genuinely meant to make a point about racism and to show solidarity with DA, and the wrong phrase used really shouldn't detract from that. I'm disappointed that Diane Abbot, a highly successful black woman who makes a major contribution to British comedy uses Rudd's use of words to score a political point. It isn't necessary.
We devalue the real fight against the evil of racism if we continue to vilify people who, with all good intent (and her point was that abuse of women and black women in particular is heinous), use the wrong word. It's not a word we use nowadays, it can be offensive to some, she's said sorry and maybe that will stop others saying it. That's the end of it for me.
I think black is okay, as is gay for homosexual people.
The point is that ‘ white has historically never been used as a general term of abuse, where as coloured, ******, paki, spastic,queer, have all been used as abusive terms for various groups. To use any of these , and other words that denigrate a specific group is considered now to be worthy of censure.
It may evolve that’gammon’ will be deemed to be a racist term of abuse in the future, and then everybody will have something to get irate about.
Amber Rudd? The Windrush deportations of black people Amber Rudd? That good intent?
Entirely agree with this. However, she still has a lot to answer for after The Windrush Scandal and her role in The Hostile Environment policy. I guess that why Ms Abbott remarked about her 'clumsy language' being revealing.