Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

All schools being privatised under Tories



Albumen

Don't wait for me!
Jan 19, 2010
11,495
Brighton - In your face
http://www.theguardian.com/educatio...ol-to-become-an-academy-ministers-to-announce

Every English school to become an academy, ministers to announce

Legislation to turn every school in England into an academy independent of local authority control will be unveiled in the budget.

Draft leglislation, to be published possibly as early as Thursday, will begin the process of implementing a pledge made by David Cameron in his conference speech last autumn.

The prime minister said his “vision for our schooling system” was to place education into the hands of headteachers and teachers rather than “bureaucrats”.

The move follows criticism of the government for going into stasis during the referendum campaign. Cameron and the chancellor, George Osborne, are keen to show that they are in charge of a “reforming” government.

Sources told the Guardian that the plans would be a key part of Osborne’s budget on Wednesday in order to start the process before officials are forced to shut down work because of the purdah before the May elections and EU referendum.

As the chancellor prepares to announce his budget against the backdrop of a deteriorating economic outlook, the government is keen to show that it is pressing ahead with changes, despite the looming referendum.


The stories you need to read, in one handy email
Read more
The chancellor has faced claims of backing away from major measures after he dropped proposals for a radical overhaul of tax relief for pension contributions.

Nicky Morgan, the education secretary, who has been touted as a potential rival to Osborne for the Conservative leadership when the prime minister steps down, is expected to give more details of the plan for the education shakeup when she opens the House of Commons debate on the budget on Thursday. She will appear on the BBC’s Question Time on Thursday evening. The Treasury refused to comment.

The plans are likely to be fiercely rejected by Labour, which argues that taking thousands of schools out of council control means that accountability and oversight falls on to Whitehall alone.

Advertisement

Lucy Powell, the shadow schools minister, said there was “no evidence to suggest that academisation in and of itself leads to school improvement”.

She pointed out that the chief inspector of schools, Sir Michael Wilshaw, had written to the secretary of state for education highlighting serious weaknesses in academy chains.

“How the government can plough ahead with the wholesale academisation of all schools in light of his evidence beggars belief. We want to see robust accountability and oversight of all schools regardless of type,” she said.

Powell accused the government of offering nothing new, saying ministers should focus instead on teacher shortages, school places and inequalities.

In his memo to the education secretary, Wilshaw had said: “Many of the trusts manifested the same weaknesses as the worst-performing local authorities and offered the same excuses. Indeed, one chief executive blamed parents for pupils’ poor attendance affecting pupils’ performance.

“There has been much criticism in the past of local authorities failing to take swift action with struggling schools. Given the impetus of the academies programme to bring about rapid improvement, it is of great concern that we are not seeing this in these seven MATs [multi-academy trusts] and that, in some cases, we have even seen decline.”

But the legislation is very likely to pass because the issue is widely supported by Conservatives, and the SNP would probably abstain on any votes affecting English education.

The white paper will come just days before the government’s education and adoption bill is made law.

That bill was introduced to “sweep away bureaucratic and legal loopholes” and speed up the process of dealing with failing schools by taking them out of local authority control and putting them in the hands of academy sponsors.

When the bill was introduced, the government estimated that up to 1,000 “failing” schools would be turned into academies as a result.

Of the more than 24,000 schools in England, about 5,000 are now academies – and with 85% of primaries still in local authority control this gives some insight into the scale of the task ahead.

The role of the local authority in the education of the nation’s children, which has been gradually eroded with the introduction of academies, will be virtually brought to an end by such legislation.

Schools and councils have been bracing themselves since the prime minister first outlined his education vision and they will be keen to know now the detail in terms of timing and process.

Former education secretary Michael Gove, who launched the Tories’ education plans, originally considered making all schools academies but pulled back because of the challenges it would pose.

Concerns have already been raised about whether there would be enough good sponsors to take on schools. With many more schools facing academisation, that task will be even greater at a time when some academy trusts are facing criticism for under-achievement.

MPs sitting on the education select committee announced this week they would be launching an inquiry into multiple academy trusts after a series of Ofsted inspections raised concerns.

Teachers’ unions, who have been critical of the academisation process, said parents and teachers would be outraged. Kevin Courtney, the deputy general secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said: “Finally the government has come clean on its education priorities and admitted that its real agenda all along has been that every school must become an academy.

“The fig leaf of ‘parental choice’, ‘school autonomy’ and ‘raising standards’ has finally been dropped and the government’s real agenda has been laid bare – all schools removed from collaborative structures within a local authority family of schools, all schools instead run by remote academy trusts, unaccountable to parents, staff or local communities.”

Councils reacted angrily to the news. Councillor Roy Perry, chairman of the Local Government Association’s children and young people board, said: “Ofsted has rated 82% of council-maintained schools as good or outstanding, so it defies reason that councils are being portrayed as barriers to improvement. Ofsted has not only identified that improvement in secondary schools – most of which are academies – has stalled, but it has praised strong improvement in primary schools, most of which are maintained.”

He said only 15% of the largest academy chains perform above the national average in terms of pupil progress, compared with 44% of council-run schools.

“It’s vital that we concentrate on the quality of education and a school’s ability to deliver the best results for children, rather than on the legal status of a school, to make sure that we’re providing the education and support needed in each area,” he said. “The LGA opposes forced academisation and giving significant powers relating to education to unelected civil servants with parents and residents unable to hold them to account at the ballot box.”
 








glasfryn

cleaning up cat sick
Nov 29, 2005
20,261
somewhere in Eastbourne
4 more years of this shite
 














Bakero

Languidly clinical
Oct 9, 2010
14,898
Almería
What's the problem? Schools are currently a drain on the economy. Now Dave and his mates can turn a tidy profit.
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,830
Uffern
What's the problem? Schools are currently a drain on the economy. Now Dave and his mates can turn a tidy profit.

And giving away billions of pounds of buildings and land in the process.

I wonder if this will happen though - there are probably a few Tories unhappy with this. And it has to get through the Lords. As it's not a finance bill and it wasn't in the manifesto, the peers will have a free hand to block, hinder and amend
 


GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,186
Gloucester
And giving away billions of pounds of buildings and land in the process.

I wonder if this will happen though - there are probably a few Tories unhappy with this. And it has to get through the Lords. As it's not a finance bill and it wasn't in the manifesto, the peers will have a free hand to block, hinder and amend
Go Peers, go!
 




JC Footy Genius

Bringer of TRUTH
Jun 9, 2015
10,568
What is an academy?

Academies are independent, state-funded schools, which receive their funding directly from central government, rather than through a local authority.
Although the day-to-day running of the school remains with the head teacher or principal, they are overseen by individual charitable bodies called academy trusts and may be part of an academy chain.
Theses trusts provide advice, support and expertise.

Are academies all about improving failing schools?
Not any more. The policy, which originated under Labour, aimed to improve struggling schools, primarily in deprived areas.
And this continues under the sponsored-academy model, where failing schools are taken over and run by an academy trust, usually under a new principal and governing body.
But this has been changed radically and accelerated by the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition.
Now all schools - primary as well as secondary - have been invited to convert to academy status, but priority has being given to those deemed by education watchdog Ofsted to be "outstanding" or "performing well".
These are known as converter academies and are in part about spreading good practice from the best schools.
The government argues academies drive up standards by putting more power in the hands of head teachers and cutting bureaucracy.
It says they have been shown to improve twice as fast as other state schools.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-13274090
 




Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,830
Uffern
Wasn't this a Labour invention? Whatever. good to hear the debate although i will be sceptical

It was ... to improve failing schools. That's not the same as interfering with a school that's doing well. There were concerns raised by Ofsted only this week about the poor performance of some the academy chains.

Look at B&H: which is best performing state school? Stringer. Which is the worst? Brighton Aldridge Community Academy
 




Hampster Gull

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2010
13,465
It was ... to improve failing schools. That's not the same as interfering with a school that's doing well. There were concerns raised by Ofsted only this week about the poor performance of some the academy chains.

Look at B&H: which is best performing state school? Stringer. Which is the worst? Brighton Aldridge Community Academy

So Labour did tell with that one then
 




sir albion

New member
Jan 6, 2007
13,055
SWINDON
So more shareholders out to make loads of money dear o dear.... We're so going down the wrong path in this country.
Doubt it'll be funded by the local authorities solely.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,019
Taking it away from public to private = privatisation.

no it isnt. privatisation is the trasnfer ownership from the public to private sector. this isnt what is being suggested here, even the Guardian doesnt make this assertion.

and who came up with acedemy schools anyway?
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here