In a rubbish standard!!! So would that give a county league player with a similar numerical trophy haul the right to be a pundit?
Absolutely not as County League is nowhere near the standard to women's pro football.
In a rubbish standard!!! So would that give a county league player with a similar numerical trophy haul the right to be a pundit?
Absolutely not as County League is nowhere near the standard to women's pro football.
Are you able to prove this? I acknowledge I can't prove that CL is better than birds football or vice versa.
Your posts show you to be clearly sexist.
Your posts show you to be clearly sexist.
1. None of that is a requirement for being a pundit and 2. The comment "Birds football" amoung others.
Er, 'clearly' they do not.
He is making his argument on the basis of competance. He believes you need to have acquired experience in the game at the applicable level to pass analytical comment on it. That's where I disagree, I think just about anybody can give good insight on football if they know their stuff.
I can make that point without the need to suggest he disrespects/hates women or something absurdly ridiculous like that.
1. None of that is a requirement for being a pundit and 2. The comment "Birds football" amoung others.
It is nothing to do with towing the 'trendy line', whtever that is. If you think women can not have an opinion on a game because they are women, like you do, that is OBVIOUSLY sexist.
Of course any woman can have an opinion on any sport just like any man. You don't have to agree with their opinion but it is not invalid becaise they are a woman.
It is nothing to do with towing the 'trendy line', whtever that is. If you think women can not have an opinion on a game because they are women, like you do, that is OBVIOUSLY sexist.
Of course any woman can have an opinion on any sport just like any man. You don't have to agree with their opinion but it is not invalid becaise they are a woman.
Told you. Fishing.
1. Do you live in a parallel universe? Nearly all pundits in this country (unlike europe) are ex pros so it seems like it is a requirement. You just backed up the point for which I disagree with him on which is rather strange. I would be just as likely to question why Alan Shearer is there as I am Alex Scott.
2. If referring to women as 'birds' is a throwaway sexist remark, then it is rife in the youth of today. Somehow I don't think this pertains to prejudice.
And yet people like Mourinhio would and have been acceptable in the past. Give over.
Why? You only have to watch her and others to see that their insight is at the same standard as the regular male pundits. So she has proven to be qualified.
If anyone is the snowflake it is you after getting all riled up over a woman on tv. Its ok, maybe we can find you safe space with men on the tv so it does not upset you.
You don't have to have played the game to know the technical details of what is happening. You need good knowledge of the game and good communication skills. Neither of those require playing the game.
I expect them to be in a lot of trouble if they did not conduct interviews, post the job and hire the best candidate.
I expect them to be in a lot of trouble if they did not conduct interviews, post the job and hire the best candidate.
Only if you assume they are as sexist as you. To be honest, it amazes me that the mods on here allow such sexist filth to be spouted.
YES! You only have to listen to them to realise that. If she wrote a script that shearer then read you would be waxing lyrical about how amazing he was.
I am just ignoring your last comment.