Bryan Wade V NewcastleFrom past Albion performances, can you give an example of a 10?
BTW, This deserves a thread of its own.
Although the RDZ OUT/ are we entitled? threads should of course take priority.
Bryan Wade V NewcastleFrom past Albion performances, can you give an example of a 10?
It's a minor quibble but I think all of the good stuff he did warrants an 8. But you're right on his wastefulness, and also to point to his role in their disallowed goal -- Pascal absolutely slaughtered him afterwards.Just watched it. The ball to Gross was excellent as was the cross in the second half which was scrambled for a corner, but two minutes earlier when better placed and more time, he hit a terrible ball - which doesn’t get shown.
I do feel I’m right with my match rating (7/10), he was good in places, but wasteful in others, which of course they don’t show during analysis.
He also dithered in their offside goal, but it was offside so didn’t matter.
Spot on.I thought Veltman was motm.
He does tend to be the spare man when we move with possession up the pitch. I think this is partly because the opposition see him as the least threatening - he’s not gonna burst beyond someone for pace or play a defence splitting pass, but he will pretty much always pick a steady, intelligent option. He’s very predictable in what he does, but he does it very well.
Adingra was a constant threat absolutely battered Konsa, yes he had a few wasteful moments yet got his reward in the end won the game for us.I will do. But you can do a lot with editing, and quite often as a player, it’s what you don’t do when you have the ball.
Yeah fair enough, he certainly wasn’t perfect. But I’d say a 7/10 is a pretty average/standard/expected performance and he was better than thatJust watched it. The ball to Gross was excellent as was the cross in the second half which was scrambled for a corner, but two minutes earlier when better placed and more time, he hit a terrible ball - which doesn’t get shown.
I do feel I’m right with my match rating (7/10), he was good in places, but wasteful in others, which of course they don’t show during analysis.
He also dithered in their offside goal, but it was offside so didn’t matter.
Whoscored.com would agreeYeah fair enough, he certainly wasn’t perfect. But I’d say a 7/10 is a pretty average/standard/expected performance and he was better than that
More than a few.Adingra was a constant threat absolutely battered Konsa, yes he had a few wasteful moments yet got his reward in the end won the game for us.
6/10 is the industry standard for average.Yeah fair enough, he certainly wasn’t perfect. But I’d say a 7/10 is a pretty average/standard/expected performance and he was better than that
…yet it has most of the team around or slightly above 6 …and is broadly consistent with most other independent published ratings6/10 is the industry standard for average.
Both halves out of 5.
I agree he was better than average.
As for whoscored.com - no thank you.
Sorry @dazzer6666
I don’t look at other ratings.…yet it has most of the team around or slightly above 6 …and is broadly consistent with most other independent published ratings
Outfits like whoscored are less opinions and more data-led…….which has it’s own limitationsI don’t look at other ratings.
The Argus has our players significantly higher, but we really weren’t that good.
As for Pedro scoring higher than Veltman and Webster especially, there’s not a lot more to say…… it really is all opinions.
Definitely.Outfits like whoscored are less opinions and more data-led…….which has it’s own limitations
These are a good ratings.Bart 6 -- not much to do
Veltman 8 JMotM -- he was brilliant defensively today
Webster 8 JMotM -- snuffed Watkins out
Dunk 7.5 -- some great long balls today, read the game well
Igor 7 -- solid
Gilmour 7 -- kept things ticking over; his corners were good
Gross 7
Buonanotte 6 -- good at pressing but didn't do much with the ball
Adingra 8 JMotM -- had Konsa on toast, so many openings came down that side courtesy of him
Joao Pedro 7 -- some really good stuff in there
Welbeck 6
Subs:
Enciso 8 -- his best performance since returning from injury
the rest n/a
I’d give Webster a 7 too
Webster 8 JMotM -- snuffed Watkins out
Webster 8 - I know he made a few small mistakes but stood out to me because of his major improvement, after all the criticism.
I’d give Webster 9
Webster - 8
Really delighted to see these, btw.Webster - 8 MOTM Still gets vilified for the occasional misplaced pass, but others did the same and don't get the same stick. 27 appearances in our stunning season last year is enough for
Barco deserves a 10 just for nutmegging Matty Cash.These could be way off, as frankly, I'm drunk. But here goes...
Bart 6 not much to do, slightly nervous kicking?
Igor 6 up & down
Dunk 7
Webster 6.5
Veltman 8.5 fit again, proper Joel
Gilmour 7
Gross 6
Buonanotte 6.5
Adingra 6.5
Pedro 7
Welbeck 7.5
Enciso 8 woke us up
Moder 6
Barco 7
Baleba 6
RDZ 7
I said in the Veltman thread that I though the defence was superb as a whole. Vetlman was his usual excellent and consistent self, Webster was that elegant defender we know he can be, Dunk was....well Dunk and Igor did a good job and also got forward and played some excellent through balls.Really delighted to see these, btw.
I thought he was excellent, and pleased to see (nearly) everyone recognising that.
And the dramatic “he killed me” crash to the ground when Cash left a foot danglingBarco deserves a 10 just for nutmegging Matty Cash.