You think that was rude? Not just rude, but "remarkably rude"? I've seen plenty of disagreements about ratings on here, I've had people disagree with me with quite aggressive and offensive language, and I don't see how what I wrote even comes close to even impolite, let alone 'remarkably rude'.
You're free to rate them however you please, but anyone who posts in this thread will also be open to anyone disagreeing or noting things like inconsistent marking from player to player and so on.
I think most fans' ratings are tinged by their biases, I just happen to think it was more notable when you mark low a player who was on the field less than half the time as someone you explicitly felt wasn't on long enough to make an impact.