Creaky
Well-known member
Why the need for this to be included in the statement, "This issue generated very negative press coverage, inconvenience to our visitors for which we have apologised, as well as speculation and rumour, much of it exaggerated or untrue."
The inference has to be that had none of these occurred a statement regarding "poogate" would not have been made - yet the details that were given about this in the statement suggest that they could have been made public within days, if not hours, and had this been the case then "negative press coverage" and "speculation and rumour" would have been minimised.
Not handled very well in my opinion nor the level of professionalism I'd expect from an experienced CEO.
The inference has to be that had none of these occurred a statement regarding "poogate" would not have been made - yet the details that were given about this in the statement suggest that they could have been made public within days, if not hours, and had this been the case then "negative press coverage" and "speculation and rumour" would have been minimised.
Not handled very well in my opinion nor the level of professionalism I'd expect from an experienced CEO.