1
Benny Zamora said:At the risk of Meldrewing this thread, would it be too much to ask for a home shirt next season that doesn't look like they ran out of blue two thirds of the way down and an away shirt that's a slightly better colour than maroon?
Benny Zamora said:Yeah, the collar is shit and so is the iron-on patch. It really annoys me that of all the kits we've had in the last few years, two of the best were done by Bellotti (classic blue and white Sandtex one and Inter Milan away one.) The colour of the new shirt is great but the white final third of it makes it unwearable - why would fans want to tuck it in?
Turkey said:Maroon will be the third kit.
I'd rather the logo isn't a stciker as well but as Skint have only today confirmed their sponsorship they'll probably say that we didn't know if they'd be our sponsor and couldn't tell Errea early enough.
Wardywonderland said:I think the mention of the new away kit is in reference to the fact that since they have signed a 2 year deal, they will still be our sponsor when we change our away kit in the 2007/08 season.
Silent Bob said:From Insider:
No it won't [be part of the kit] - the reason being that the shirt wouldn't be ready until October unless it is manufactured in this way! The shirt is already made, with the sponsors name now set to be applied (99% of shirts are now made this way). If we were to be beginning production now, we would have a long wait before shirts were on sale.
Also, we confident this problem has been solved: the new application process (used on maroon and navy kits) is much better than the application process used on the last home kit (which was a problem). The club shop haven't had one of the maroon or navy shirts returned for this reason.
Sounds good. I've never had any problem with the "sticker" on my maroon, palookaville, or white shirts, so maybe it is just the crappy home one?