Great thread.
These would've been the worst ratings I'd ever heard of for a game, but I now see it was a cock/stitch up.
Marking Murray down to an 8 (when he thought he deserved a 9) seems like sensible local paper bias, it would be nice to see what the paper was going to give for the rest. FDM had a great match, only failing to save an unstoppable penalty.
These would've been the worst ratings I'd ever heard of for a game, but I now see it was a cock/stitch up.
Could you thank him for the reply (no doubt you've already done that) and ask him to email the ratings he had done for our team?the sub editor responsible for the page neglected to use the away team ratings I emailed from St Mary's
Marking Murray down to an 8 (when he thought he deserved a 9) seems like sensible local paper bias, it would be nice to see what the paper was going to give for the rest. FDM had a great match, only failing to save an unstoppable penalty.