Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Albion announce £122.8m profit for the 2022/23 season







A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,857
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Pw Scrooge GIF
 


AZ Gull

@SeagullsAcademy @seagullsacademy.bsky.social
Oct 14, 2003
13,183
Chandler, AZ
This is not the case. Pedro’s 30m fee will have come off of the cash balance, but he’ll have been included on the asset register with a value of 30m. Net result: zero loss. This value willl be amortised over the 5 years of his contract, so in terms of the accounts he’ll cost the club 6m a year until either his current contract expires or he signs a new deal.
The question I was responding to was whether Joao Pedro's purchase was in this set of accounts (22-23) or next year (23-24). I was making the point it will be in this year's.
 




nwgull

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2003
14,533
Manchester
So sales are included as the full sale price upfront but purchases are spread across the length of the contract? That seems really odd.
It's standard accountancy practice and makes sense as part of a business's value is it's assets. Having a 30m player contracted for 4 years is a significant asset!
 








AZ Gull

@SeagullsAcademy @seagullsacademy.bsky.social
Oct 14, 2003
13,183
Chandler, AZ
So sales are included as the full sale price upfront but purchases are spread across the length of the contract? That seems really odd.
It isn't really.

If you were a manufacturing company and bought a machine that would be in operation for five years, it makes perfect sense to spread the purchase cost out over those five years.
If you then sold an older machine that you no longer required, to a different manufacturing company, you would recognise the proceeds of the sale in the year you sold it (along with some accountancy jiggery pokery based upon the remaining value it had on your books).

In essence football clubs are doing exactly that with players (except they are referred to as intangible assets rather than fixed assets).
 




origigull

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2009
1,262




Perkino

Well-known member
Dec 11, 2009
6,056
Fabulous news, I don't expect this to have any impact on our strategy. Sell a couple in the summer for big money and bring in a handful of potentials all U21's and possibly 1 experienced player to bolster the squad
 




Peppermint Tea

Well-known member
Aug 31, 2007
1,268
Fabulous news, I don't expect this to have any impact on our strategy. Sell a couple in the summer for big money and bring in a handful of potentials all U21's and possibly 1 experienced player to bolster the squad
Agree re no change to the overarching strategy. However, I do think the squad needs more of an overhaul this summer than in any of the last few summers. I say that because I feel we have recalibrated our ambitions to be pushing for European places, not just top 10.
 


Gabbiano

Well-known member
Dec 18, 2017
1,791
Spank the Manc
It's standard accountancy practice and makes sense as part of a business's value is it's assets. Having a 30m player contracted for 4 years is a significant asset!
When you put it like that it makes much more sense!

I'll never be an accountant, I don't think in the right logic for it!
 


nwgull

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2003
14,533
Manchester
Fabulous news, I don't expect this to have any impact on our strategy. Sell a couple in the summer for big money and bring in a handful of potentials all U21's and possibly 1 experienced player to bolster the squad
I don't know, we've often bought straight-into-the-first-choice-team players - eg Cucurella, Estupinan and Pedro - but they're usually limited to one per window. I reckon we might buy 2 or 3 this year, and I don't think we'll sell anyone apart from Undav and maybe a couple of other loanees that aren't likley to step up to PL level.
 








Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,554
Back in Sussex






cjd

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2006
6,322
La Rochelle




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here