Dave the OAP
Well-known member
Well?
I was 100% confident, however I am rapidly losing faith and now waver towards not
I was 100% confident, however I am rapidly losing faith and now waver towards not
Last edited:
The Large One said:I am 100% confident. Lewes' ridiculous challenges cannot go on forever - they just can't, no matter how people feel abou today's news.
Doesn't stop me feeling 100% pissed off with these self-serving, self-important bastards though.
Rusco said:I think you are all missing the point, this article is all about club spin.
What the article says is that we have had to put Falmer back another year, at a cost of £50k per week to the club. So what this highlights is that if LDC are serious about going ahead with the judicial review and lose, then the are not only liable to pay legal costs, but they could also have to pay compensation to the club to the tune of £2.5m.
I think the club have been very clever getting this published, it's done to make LDC think again.
blockhseagull said:Can we claim compo for loss of revenue ?
Rusco said:I think you are all missing the point, this article is all about club spin.
What the article says is that we have had to put Falmer back another year, at a cost of £50k per week to the club. So what this highlights is that if LDC are serious about going ahead with the judicial review and lose, then the are not only liable to pay legal costs, but they could also have to pay compensation to the club to the tune of £2.5m.
I think the club have been very clever getting this published, it's done to make LDC think again.
Rusco said:
Dies Irae said:I dont think you can as they are contesting a legal point.
I also think that this will be viewed as consequential loss and quantifying this would be impossible.
I don't think that's the point the club are making. Yes, there's spin here, but it's also keeping us appraised of the situation in case people think the case has gone cold. There is never any way that the club can think it can claim on lost earnings, just pointing out how destructive Lewes' narrow-minded arrogance and stupidity can be - and is.Rusco said:I think you are all missing the point, this article is all about club spin.
What the article says is that we have had to put Falmer back another year, at a cost of £50k per week to the club. So what this highlights is that if LDC are serious about going ahead with the judicial review and lose, then the are not only liable to pay legal costs, but they could also have to pay compensation to the club to the tune of £2.5m.
I think the club have been very clever getting this published, it's done to make LDC think again.
Dies Irae said:I dont think you can as they are contesting a legal point.
I also think that this will be viewed as consequential loss and quantifying this would be impossible.