- May 8, 2018
- 10,639
Probably been a bit harsh on him to be fair, I couldn’t think of another example at the timeRumbled. Must change my username !
Probably been a bit harsh on him to be fair, I couldn’t think of another example at the timeRumbled. Must change my username !
Thought he signalled to the bench.Subbed off as a sub and not cos he was injured is never a good thing so hope we can eek a few quid more out of someone for him
The general view from Rangers supporters is that as a footballer he's a bit Bambi on ice who doesn't do much - except score goals, which he's been doing pretty regularly. I think they'd like to have him back.Didn’t really notice him during his two friendly appearances.
We are so stacked in forward positions, I’d imagine that Rangers will be given the green light soon.
If he scores goals, possibly a little easier?The general view from Rangers supporters is that as a footballer he's a bit Bambi on ice who doesn't do much - except score goals, which he's been doing pretty regularly. I think they'd like to have him back.
Stumbling block is that we paid around £7M for him - recouping that is going to be difficult.
For accounting/profit reporting purposes, he has one year left on his four year contract. Therefore anything over £1.75m would be a PSR profit with the rest having already been amortised. This doesn’t take into account any loan fees we’ve received from Rangers in addition to or in lieu of wage contributions.The general view from Rangers supporters is that as a footballer he's a bit Bambi on ice who doesn't do much - except score goals, which he's been doing pretty regularly. I think they'd like to have him back.
Stumbling block is that we paid around £7M for him - recouping that is going to be difficult.
For accounting/profit reporting purposes, he has one year left on his four year contract. Therefore anything over £1.75m would be a PSR profit with the rest having already been amortised. This doesn’t take into account any loan fees we’ve received from Rangers in addition to or in lieu of wage contributions.
I’ve noticed you get very bogged down in making a perceived profit on every transfer, based on the fee we originally paid compared against the fee we later receive. I think you don’t need to worry about this so much, all that matters is PSR accounting from the club’s perspective. Not every transfer is going to be like Caicedo or Cucurella where we flip a player for a notional 10,000% return on investment.
Each season of amortisation is budgeted to be spent, including one year of Sima (£1.75m) and everyone else.
Tallies with the ciew of a Rangers fan I know. He’s slightly baffled by Sima’s ability in front of goal as otherwise he looks short of the standard we’d require.The general view from Rangers supporters is that as a footballer he's a bit Bambi on ice who doesn't do much - except score goals, which he's been doing pretty regularly. I think they'd like to have him back.
Stumbling block is that we paid around £7M for him - recouping that is going to be difficult.
Same here - my Rangers supporting mate has said he doesn't think his general play is good enough for the Premier League but he knows where the net is. Could end up like Pukki at Norwich - not quite good enough for the top division but lethal at a slightly lower level.Tallies with the ciew of a Rangers fan I know. He’s slightly baffled by Sima’s ability in front of goal as otherwise he looks short of the standard we’d require.
Given his goalscoring record surely we should be looking for more than 2m for him.Rangers would deffo pay £2m for him, he’s liked a lot by the management and fans. If he was made available for that sort of money and wanted to go a deal would get done pretty quickly.
That's the trouble. He doesn't look very good (he isn't) except when he scores a goal ................................. which he does quite a lot! He played for what, half of the second half in both matches, and in that limited time he didn't score, so all we saw was the bad bits.Noticed he gave the ball away cheaply a few times on Sunday, one pass he made from the edge of their box with his back to goal went a mile astray, and led to a dangerous counter-attack. I've really not seen enough of him to just write him off, but unlike most of the other forwards who really seized their chance (Ayari, Buananotte, Sarmiento and the newbies), Sima looked short of the quality we now have. And with the sheer number of options we've got, it looks like he will probably miss out (from the little I've seen).
Seriously doubt they can.That's the trouble. He doesn't look very good (he isn't) except when he scores a goal ................................. which he does quite a lot! He played for what, half of the second half in both matches, and in that limited time he didn't score, so all we saw was the bad bits.
I do agree, though, that he's one to sell, but he has got that £7M price tag round his neck. We won't make a profit, I don't expect, but I guess we'd want to recoup what we spent. Rangers can afford that. Will they though?