Aaron Wilbraham

[glasfryn]

Mark, this is your time fella. Let go of all of your negative feelings here, nobody and I mean nobody will question you for it. GO

yep give it to them both barrels mate
and I see we have had an offer for Clayton at Huddersfield snubbed as well
WTF are the club up to

 

[Se20]

Wilbs ain't a bad player, but he isn't a goal scorer.
He's an intelligent footballer, good at holding up the ball and a good passer, but he needs someone nippy with him (cms ?)
I'm hearing he could be part of a possible deal for Buckley, with another Palace player (Garvin ?) maybe included. The two clubs are miles apart in their valuations of Buckley, So it could be a compromise .
Both Wilbraham and Garvin would fit into your wage structure.

 

[Insel affe]

if it ends up being Hammond and Wilbraham it will be so disappointing.

You know what with all the good players we have been linked with over the past month, it is very Brighton of old to end up with this fecktard and Hammond, showing no sign of moving forward.... Please god no.

 

[MattBackHome]

The thought of him posing with an Albion shirt is actually making me laugh, but with fear and panic.

 

[DJ NOBO]

WHY, why would you even say that? Kids read this forum, it's going to cause tears you know

Sorry kids but console yourselves that it won't be worse than Mark Farrington replacing Mike Small

 

[Hillian1]

Wilbs ain't a bad player, but he isn't a goal scorer.
He's an intelligent footballer, good at holding up the ball and a good passer, but he needs someone nippy with him (cms ?)
I'm hearing he could be part of a possible deal for Buckley, with another Palace player (Garvin ?) maybe included. The two clubs are miles apart in their valuations of Buckley, So it could be a compromise .
Both Wilbraham and Garvin would fit into your wage structure.

The only positive comment on this entire thread relating to him and it's from a palace fan.

IT'S A TRAP.

 

[Icy Gull]

Wilbs ain't a bad player, but he isn't a goal scorer.
He's an intelligent footballer, good at holding up the ball and a good passer, but he needs someone nippy with him (cms ?)
I'm hearing he could be part of a possible deal for Buckley, with another Palace player (Garvin ?) maybe included. The two clubs are miles apart in their valuations of Buckley, So it could be a compromise .
Both Wilbraham and Garvin would fit into your wage structure.

Garvin can do one too, he's already turned us down once. I believe he's a dyed in the wool Palace Scummer too, has he no pride?

 

[B.W.]

Wilbs ain't a bad player, but he isn't a goal scorer.
He's an intelligent footballer, good at holding up the ball and a good passer, but he needs someone nippy with him (cms ?)
I'm hearing he could be part of a possible deal for Buckley, with another Palace player (Garvin ?) maybe included. The two clubs are miles apart in their valuations of Buckley, So it could be a compromise .
Both Wilbraham and Garvin would fit into your wage structure.

Please no. Just no. Garvin OK, but nothing special. And losing Will too. What a ****ing 'mare that would be.

 

[Blue Valkyrie]

Wilbs ain't a bad player, but he isn't a goal scorer.
He's an intelligent footballer, good at holding up the ball and a good passer, but he needs someone nippy with him (cms ?)
I'm hearing he could be part of a possible deal for Buckley, with another Palace player (Garvin ?) maybe included. The two clubs are miles apart in their valuations of Buckley, So it could be a compromise .
Both Wilbraham and Garvin would fit into your wage structure.

I think perhaps it is best that Palace pay the full fee for Buckley and not try a swap with your worst players.

A swap for Murray would work though, I think.

 

[algie]

This is getting embarrassing now. We are struggling to score goals and pursing players like this isn't going to change that.

 

[Stat Brother]

Well **** my old boots, this pretty much cements it. Even SB recognises he's shyte

I will raise that, still further.

That signing could well bring my blind faith loyalty of the club hierarchy, into question.

Bloom, Burke, Barber out OUT OUT

 

[penny's harmonica]

This is only being taken seriously up the road. Not an option for us.

He's 34!!!??!!! Thirty fickin four!

 

[BensGrandad]

Hope not signing him would compare to the old man Micky Adams signed as a striker at Withdean, cant remember his name.

 

[algie]

Hope not signing him would compare to the old man Micky Adams signed as a striker at Withdean, cant remember his name.

Phil Stant?

 

[B.W.]

Sorry kids but console yourselves that it won't be worse than Mark Farrington replacing Mike Small

I think it would, and that is saying something!

 

[imissworthing2]

DB: So Oscar, I've done extensive research: searched every league in the world using are web of scouts and I've got just the man u need....wait for it: Aaron Wilbraham>

I've kept quiet on how the transfer dealings are being done this season. Yes, I agree, Oscar gets to pick from a shortlist so therefore all signings are his but it doesnt mean its right.

Please Oscar sign Carlos Kickaball: use ur no doubt large knowledge of european football to bring in anyone. After all when things go tits up it wont be Burke that gets the sack because our signings can't pass the ball

 

[MillitantSeagull]

No thanks, he's ****ing shit.

 

[MattBackHome]

Wilbs ain't a bad player, but he isn't a goal scorer.
He's an intelligent footballer, good at holding up the ball and a good passer, but he needs someone nippy with him (cms ?)
I'm hearing he could be part of a possible deal for Buckley, with another Palace player (Garvin ?) maybe included. The two clubs are miles apart in their valuations of Buckley, So it could be a compromise .
Both Wilbraham and Garvin would fit into your wage structure.

He's a joke figure at Selhurst. Nice sales pitch though.

 

[HawkTheSeagull]

If this happened, I would be INCREDIBLY disappointed and unhappy.

 

[nevergoagain]

Got to be a wind up, who on earth could think that neverhadit toss rag would be an improvement to our squad.