Whilst bushy is most definitely right, he only get arsey because his team (Chelsea) have rather more floating fans that most. And I'm not looking for a binfest here, but that is the truth of the matter. And Albion have never been much better. 30,000 in the good times, 9,000 when things were looking gloomy.Blimey, I agree with Bushy. Clubs that rely on the hardcore fans are screwed. If we're only pulling in 6,000 fans at Falmer, we'll be screwed too. Not everyone can be a superfan, circumstances change. I used to go every home game and most away games when I was single; when I met Mrs G, that dropped to every home game and some away games; when I had kids that dropped to some home games - does that make me a fair weather fan?
And to be fair, I think Man City had rather few fair weather fans than most - they were still pulling in 30,000 in the 3rd division a few years back.
As for Man U, I can't gloat enough. I hope their financial problems mount, they're forced to sell the ground and drop down the league with Rio Ferdinand reduced to giving hand-jobs down Canal Street.
As for City, you have to say they are amongst the most loyal of supporters. In the dark days of the late 80s when gates were rubbish everywhere, City were still pulling in 20,000 for unattractive midweek matches. They were a club yo-yoing between the top two division like Newcastle and Chelsea, yet their gates didn't vary hugely between attractive and unattractive matches. Newcastle would get about 16,000 for dull games and 30,000 for the bigger ones. Chelsea's upper and lower limits were even further apart.