hillianseagull
Member
- Thread starter
- #61
Your expression 'putting the OP straight' is in itself inflammatory. You can say that you have a different opinion, but your post comes across as very arrogant.
To be fair I did call him a
Your expression 'putting the OP straight' is in itself inflammatory. You can say that you have a different opinion, but your post comes across as very arrogant.
Your expression 'putting the OP straight' is in itself inflammatory. You can say that you have a different opinion, but your post comes across as very arrogant.
Hi TB. Well, as you know, I have my own source on the mighty Gus debacle, so that immediately makes it clear to me that the content in the OP is nonsense.
In your opinion of course.....as valid or invalid as the OP.... and do you know how I came to that conclusion??........... because you are not Bloom or Barber.
Indeed I am not. However, even the OP admits some or all (it's the latter BTW) of his first post may be untrue.
We all know. You've told us, many many times. It doesn't make it any more believable than the OP.
Source?
Source?
So you trust the content of a poster who says his/her post might be untrue. More fool you.
So you trust the content of a poster who says his/her post might be untrue. More fool you.
The OP.
Opinion and hearsay? My post was only hearsay, I bow to your greater wisdom.
My comments were not personal about you as the OP - I may not have the wisdom you suggest but do have a fair amount of experience in dealing with employment issues and that all sorts of spurious opinions can emerge within a workplace. I also have an objective viewpoint based upon trusted information already in the public domain. So I was particularly expressing concern that allegedly someone at the Club is happy to go public with what looks like dubious and inflammatory information. That is the danger with passing on hearsay. Congratulations on generating a debate and have flushed out opinions from across the Poyet spectrum, which as we know is often polarised on NSC!
When the Poyet saga gets resurrected from time to time on NSC it reminds me that I still want answers from him because of the unsatisfactory end to his time with us. Until he is vindicated (my instincts suggest this is unlikely) I will continue to feel that he owes us an apology (and I won't hold my breath). As stated in my earlier response part of me would like to see his claims of unfair dismissal tested in court, so the facts could be properly aired and a legal determination reached. Therefore I am not entirely anti-Poyet. I just want the truth.
But in the wider scheme of things this is purely a sideshow. I would much prefer to look forward rather than back - a bigger issue for me right now is for Hyypia to be successful with us.
I BELIEVE everything
I think the reason it's been dismissed so quickly is that it's clearly a load of old nadgersWhy are people so quick to dismiss the Barry Lloyd rumour ? This is exactly what happens during crisis planning. If Poyet, Tanno and Oatway had jumped ship mid season, the Board would have needed to have someone lined up. Someone trusted, someone experienced, someone who would not be seen as a contender for the job, whilst a new manager was recruited.
Barry Lloyd has good links with the Blooms, McGhee and Coppell, may have been less of a known quantity to the current board.
Why are people so quick to dismiss the Barry Lloyd rumour ? This is exactly what happens during crisis planning. If Poyet, Tanno and Oatway had jumped ship mid season, the Board would have needed to have someone lined up. Someone trusted, someone experienced, someone who would not be seen as a contender for the job, whilst a new manager was recruited.
Barry Lloyd has good links with the Blooms, McGhee and Coppell, may have been less of a known quantity to the current board.
I think the reason it's been dismissed so quickly is that it's clearly a load of old nadgers