Doubtless they have, but if it's merely repeating their same old drivel, Ruth Kelly will ignore it. She specifically stated she doesn't want a repeat of the well-rehearsed soundbites and protests - from either side.Superseagull said:As this is supposed to be a 'public process' can we 'the public' see all the submissions that have been sent to Ruth Kelly for this latest review process? I'd like to see if LDC actually submitted the document with all the BOLD TYPE COMMENTS, and of course i'm sure Falmer Parish council / CPRE / Save the honey badger society, will have dusted off the old type writer and written some more NIMBY biased drivel.
Giraffe said:I bet the postcards scared them as much as the flowers we sent to JP. I'm sure Lewes DC really freaked out when for the thousandth time we sang at a football match "We want Falmer".
I truly believe the only thing we can do is direct action against Lewes DC. And therefore everyone should get behind the Seagulls Party as much as possible. 500 members? We should have thousands behind this because this will actually make a difference. Lets frighten these bastards in their back yard. The only thing they care about is losing their seat. If we can give everything we have got into trying to achieve that it will make a difference. But also lets focus on that bitch at the top. Rallies/Protests in Lewes are long overdue.
What they have done is attempted to kill a football club that does so much good for the community of Sussex just because they don't want bigger Brighton flexing its muscles over Lewes. Its an absolute scandal and all the time there are people sitting around moaning and not doing anything about it.
Do you think Shoreham Harbour would have stopped taking live exports if the protestors had sent postcards and flowers to John Prescott? No they stopped because every day they had a delivery hundreds of lunatics turned up at their door causing grief for their staff, increasing police costs etc.
And I am not suggesting violence, but just trying to make the point that at some stage (and I think we are already about 4 years too late) Lewes District have got to realise the consequences of what they are doing.
Uncle Spielberg said:Bang On - I was one of those Lunatics at Shoreham Harbour and I strongly believe direct action against LDC in LEWES should have been taken about 15 months ago and every week since then.
Uncle Spielberg said:Bang On - I was one of those Lunatics at Shoreham Harbour and I strongly believe direct action against LDC in LEWES should have been taken about 15 months ago and every week since then.
Nemesis said:I've thought the same but haven't quite figured out what the direct action would or could be. One thing is for certain, LDC have taken the piss big time and deserve anything that comes their way.
dougdeep said:Born on the 9th of July. They should make a film about it.
DIFFBROOK said:Why would Ruth Kelly want to re-open the inquiry to look into sheepcoat.
Surely that has been all done under the last inquiry. If she does ask for another inquiry, then can the club afford it?
Secondly what would Brighton & Hove Council view be on building at Sheepcoat be?
What would the chances of getting planning permission be, if say the Govt seemed in favour of Sheepcoat but B&H council were not?
To be honest, I just want a new stadium and I dont care where.
I'M SURE IT WAS VERY GOOD COMPARED WITH STADIA IN MOST URBAN AREAS. THERE WILL BE NO PROBLEMS.Yorkie said:Having been to the match at Whitehawk today with a few hundred fans there, the hold ups and traffic were bad enough. I can't begin to imagine how bad it would be with 22,000.
Lord Bracknell said:I'M SURE IT WAS VERY GOOD COMPARED WITH STADIA IN MOST URBAN AREAS. THERE WILL BE NO PROBLEMS.
Temporary Slim Bars said:Day after my birthday....exciting stuff eh?
I was one of those Lunatics at Shoreham Harbour and I strongly believe direct action against LDC in LEWES should have been taken about 15 months ago and every week since then.