berkshire seagull
New member
How shocking is it to think we have not had a ground of our own for 8 f***ing years
Downloaded Penguin said:When we get Falmer we'll become a "normal" club with a "normal" stadium.
berkshire seagull said:How shocking is it to think we have not had a ground of our own for 8 f***ing years
Downloaded Penguin said:The Withdean experience has been GOOD for the fans, all we've been through collectively.
I would. I'd swap the last 8 years for the Goldstone Ground.Downloaded Penguin said:I wouldn't swap that 8 years for anything, just look at the success we've had.
Easy 10 said:I would. I'd swap the last 8 years for the Goldstone Ground.
Downloaded Penguin said:When we get Falmer we'll become a "normal" club with a "normal" stadium.
Stumpy Tim said:Rubbish. We'll never be a normal club. Like Oldham aren't a normal club to Oldham fans. No such thing as a normal club in my opinion
Easy 10 said:I would. I'd swap the last 8 years for the Goldstone Ground.
berkshire seagull said:How shocking is it to think we have not had a ground of our own for 8 f***ing years
bhaexpress said:My biggest fear is that many fans who used to pay on the day depending on the opposition and what was at stake will have found other ways to occupy their Saturday afternoons.
Safeway said:Really? I went through Hove on the train this evening and would be lying if I said I didn't gaze longingly over at the retail park, but I do think that if we'd kept hold of The Goldstone we'd still be rattling around in the bottom two divisions with very little to shout about on the playing field.
Very true. By now we would have had to convert the Goldstone to all seater, with little more than 8,000 at most, an east terrace with no roof, as well as poor peripheral services. Chances are the current board would not have been involved, so the dark days of 95-97 have actually allowed us as supporters to take the club forward. During the last ten years at the Goldstone, there was little interaction with the board, and we would be muddling along in the lower divisions with a piecemeal ground without any real prospect of progess. How many times during the last thirty years have various boards expressed pie in the sky ground moves? Falmer is real, its happening and gives the club more than a fighting chance of real progress.
LANGDON SEAGULL said:Safeway said:Really? I went through Hove on the train this evening and would be lying if I said I didn't gaze longingly over at the retail park, but I do think that if we'd kept hold of The Goldstone we'd still be rattling around in the bottom two divisions with very little to shout about on the playing field.
Very true. By now we would have had to convert the Goldstone to all seater, with little more than 8,000 at most, an east terrace with no roof, as well as poor peripheral services. Chances are the current board would not have been involved, so the dark days of 95-97 have actually allowed us as supporters to take the club forward. During the last ten years at the Goldstone, there was little interaction with the board, and we would be muddling along in the lower divisions with a piecemeal ground without any real prospect of progess. How many times during the last thirty years have various boards expressed pie in the sky ground moves? Falmer is real, its happening and gives the club more than a fighting chance of real progress.
Fair comment that. Bamber and Co recognised the limitations and did try to get planning permission to build at Waterhall but the council blocked it mainly because they didn't want an out of town shopping park if my memory serves.