I doubt it. If we had 33 - 35, Swansea would probably have got a result.34 points (or 33 with our GD) would've given safety
So after all that we've been safe for 70 days
In theory but given different circumstances..e.g Swansea and Saints draw, BHA stuck on 35 pts....and my Auntie had a pair of.....
But there weren't different circumstances...
But there weren't different circumstances...
My theory is the previous 40 points for safety was based on a big 4. With a big 6 we now have a 34 Points safety net. I can’t be arsed to research this theory though.
What makes me chuckle is the stupid assertion some clown in the BBC comments section posted yesterday where apparently the team in 10th with 44 points just shows how poor the standard of the league is.
How exactly does it do that then? The ONLY assertion you can really draw is that the top 6 are operating on a completely different level from the rest of the division.
In a theoretical situation where we ended up on 34 points then obviously there WOULD have been ‘different circumstances’. If we got 6 less points then it’s clearly fact that other teams or team would have those points instead. Let’s say for example our 6 less points were a result of losing both Swansea games...
If all other results had stayed the same then yes, we could have stayed up on 34 points. Those who said we were safe at that point were way off the mark, though - after we beat Arsenal to get to 34 points, at that time there were several teams who could have finished above us, so we certainly weren't safe.