keaton
Big heart, hot blood and balls. Big balls
- Nov 18, 2004
- 9,972
Companies make a lot of money too, but the workers hardly see a rise in their own money.
And that's fair?
Companies make a lot of money too, but the workers hardly see a rise in their own money.
The 300K a week has nothing to do with whether or not Rooney nor any other person is worth that sort of money - it is simply Man U protecting its investment in a player - it is the club that is treating him as a commodity.
Rooney had 18 months left on his contract, his capital value was dropping every day he didn't sign a new contract. If they wanted to sell him in the summer with just 12 months left on his contract they would be lucky to get £15M - now, with 5 years on his contract it will take 5 or 6 times that amount to get the club to sell.
They'll struggle to offload him even if they want to now. Nobody will offer him the same wages - the classic 'stumbling block' - even if United at some point decide they want to cash in on him.
He deleted it from the app store because he said it was ruining his life so he is earning nothing from it now, and even when he was he was earning £30,000 a day through advertising, he wasn't paid by an employer.. Not really comparable.
He is still earning money from it.
But that's another issue. Football is clearly not too expensive otherwise people wouldn't pay for it. No-one is forced to go to football matches or pay for it (unless you live in Haringey and your council hands Spurs money).
Really? I think you'll find quite a few fans up and down the country can't afford to attend football as often as they would like, perhaps your financial situation is more stable but a lot of people struggle to justify £500 per year costs. You're right though, nobody is forced to go but I suspect more and more fans will become disillusioned if ticket prices continue to soar along with players wages.
Really? I think you'll find quite a few fans up and down the country can't afford to attend football as often as they would like, perhaps your financial situation is more stable but a lot of people struggle to justify £500 per year costs. You're right though, nobody is forced to go but I suspect more and more fans will become disillusioned if ticket prices continue to soar along with players wages.
The 300K a week has nothing to do with whether or not Rooney nor any other person is worth that sort of money - it is simply Man U protecting its investment in a player - it is the club that is treating him as a commodity.
Rooney had 18 months left on his contract, his capital value was dropping every day he didn't sign a new contract. If they wanted to sell him in the summer with just 12 months left on his contract they would be lucky to get £15M - now, with 5 years on his contract it will take 5 or 6 times that amount to get the club to sell.
Man Utd make a load of money (or would do if it wasn't the Glazers).
Rather O/T, but I was reading the other day that they've actually paid off some of the clubs debt, something like 300m out of the 800m original debt.
They spent something like £70m last season re-financing the debt. It is insane how a massive money making club can be needlessly loaded with debt like that
What's odd is that if none of this greed existed, kids like Rooney would still be happy to charge round a football pitch week in week out for £300k a year, not a week.