BensGrandad
New member
Has Balance not had plenty of opportunities to show his metal and failed generally so perhaps he joins Mark Ramprakash and others as a good county player who cannot cut it at test level.
Those numbers would also work, and I think there is a strong case for it. What worries me is retaining Ballance as his technique is flawed at this level.
Maybe play Bairstow as a batsman only and play Buttler as wicket keeper?
Surprised nobody has suggested Luke Wright at No 3
Luke Wright who is about 33, has never played a Test, is not a top order batsman, has never shown any interest in patiently building an innings in his entire career, and has got off the mark in 2 of his last 3 Sussex innings with a straight six?
Yes, me too.
And on the subject of occasional spinners - further to the 'what is the point of Dawson?' debate - I reckon Joe Root's spin looks more threatening than his does.
Sack him off now, for an extra batter, or Woakes, if fit.
I was taking the p..s suggesting him but it obviously passed over some peoples heads.
I was thinking this and then read that Woakes is probably out for the series. Definitely an option if fit.
How could anyone possibly tell, in light of your serious suggestions over the years?
#JLloydSamuel
Even he would have been an improvement on what we had at the time but Luke Wright wouldnt be as he is a hit and miss big score or nothing batsman the likes of which we are complaining about.
debatable
Isnt that the point of NSC?
Can somebody help and find the up to date averages in county cricket this season for both Ian Bell and Jonathan Trott who would both be in the running if the recall of an oldie is considered.
Trott has retired from International cricket so he is out of the running.
Certainly the best number 3 we've had for a number of years. Really missed his stability at the top of the order.
Before him the last 4/5 years of Mark Butchers career were successful after a fairly mediocre start, but typically it's always been a problem area for us.