Theatre of Trees
Well-known member
At least we'll be spared your incessant DRIVEL for a week.
Bugger, you beat me to it.
At least we'll be spared your incessant DRIVEL for a week.
So ... which players SHOULD be sold to pay for the Falmer legal costs?
Or would people prefer the debts to mount to the point at which the Club has to go into administration?
Whilst I agree not all the money should be given to Wilkins I do think some should have even if it was just enough for a season long loan or even just a 6 month loan.
Even if it caused us to go bust?
Without knowing the accounts I dont think it would, this is "bonus" money the club cant have see this coming.
And like I said I think most of it should go into the black hole, but what harm would using 60-80k of it do? may even do a bit of good if the player they get in got a few goals and helped Brighton to a good start and got more bums on seats.
Good point.
So ... which players SHOULD be sold to pay for the Falmer legal costs?
Or would people prefer the debts to mount to the point at which the Club has to go into administration?
So ... which players SHOULD be sold to pay for the Falmer legal costs?
Or would people prefer the debts to mount to the point at which the Club has to go into administration?
You will find mr bracks that the club have made millions on player sales and compensations and fa cup games in recent years.The stone wall fact is still very clear.So ... which players SHOULD be sold to pay for the Falmer legal costs?
Or would people prefer the debts to mount to the point at which the Club has to go into administration?
Dick Knight HAS put his hand in his pocket (as have the other directors), and continues to do so on a regular basis. He just doesn't advertise it from the highest rooftops. Meanwhile, seeing as we are a club with no guaranteed future, would YOU want to sink millions into it, with a distinct possibility of never seeing it again?NO, I'd like to see the Chairman put his hand in his bloody pocket.
If he can't afford to run this club (or won't spend the money) then he should be looking for someone else to take over.
There seems to be a glut of money bags people out there at the moment looking to buy clubs in desirable locations.
With the stadium yes decision (hopefully) about to be announced, maybe its time for a change at the top to see us into the next era of this club.
On the other hand, if he does have the money, its about time he proved it.
You can kiss good bye to a proven striker now
That is such a serious allegation - involving theft and criminally false accounting - that you should go to the police with your evidence.One of the highest budgets my arse,he hasn't a clue and has mugged us with his bullshit for years,bet that money is going into his and perrys back pocket as per usual
Yes they have i agree,not a lot obviously but the question is...Dick Knight HAS put his hand in his pocket (as have the other directors), and continues to do so on a regular basis. He just doesn't advertise it from the highest rooftops. Meanwhile, seeing as we are a club with no guaranteed future, would YOU want to sink millions into it, with a distinct possibility of never seeing it again?
:yahoo:don't be such a prude mr brackers.I don't have proof either way,but do you?That is such a serious allegation - involving theft and criminally false accounting - that you should go to the police with your evidence.
Perhaps have you could the club's accounts re-audited?Yes they have i agree,not a lot obviously but the question is...
Have they had that money back mmmmm?