Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] 2020 US election - Joe Biden vs Donald Trump

Who's going to win?

  • Calling it for Trump

    Votes: 78 30.2%
  • Calling it for Biden

    Votes: 180 69.8%

  • Total voters
    258
  • Poll closed .






The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
26,210
West is BEST
Special treatment :lolol: If I wrote bungle**** on here I would be removed from thread, suspended or even banned, double standards demonstrated. :lolol:

This just makes my posting on here even more worthwhile. Were you a bully at school by the way?

Well, you've just written it and you're still here. You really have no insight into why you get banned, do you. You got banned for being one, not for writing it. :thumbsup::thumbsup:
 


knocky1

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2010
13,110
Special treatment :lolol: If I wrote bungle**** on here I would be removed from thread, suspended or even banned, double standards demonstrated. :lolol:

This just makes my posting on here even more worthwhile. Were you a bully at school by the way?

Well good fellow I believe the way is to be friendly, even to the uneducated, and jolly them along. Strike when they overstep. Wind them up if bored. Never debate and never answer their questions.

Trump is the loser not you. Man up for ****sake. You’ve got the Eton boys to be happy with.
 










symyjym

Banned
Nov 2, 2009
13,138
Brighton / Hove actually
Some or all of the content shared in this post is disputed and might be misleading about an election or other civic process.

What would you do without me? I make your warden job so much more worthwhile. I even get your disclaimers added to my posts now :lolol:

I will take this as a compliment and I shall look forward to this addition on every post I make.

Anyway in all seriousness, do you really believe that in a so called democratic election, that if more or less half the voting public, say 70 million, will ever accept the result without a full investigation of possible corruption in the voting system and unite under Biden? He is calling for the country to unite isn't he?

If the evidence of corruption is as weak as claimed he would be much better off allowing it. Then, if it does turn out that it was fair, the people who are feeling cheated now would be more likely to stand united with each other and there be calm.

Without any investigation there will be a dark cloud over his presidency and it won't just be at home in the US.

Any reasonable person should be able to understand this because at least in the last election we know that it was 100% fair. Even the Democrats had no complaints about the vote count.

Biden allowing an investigation would make him look so much the better person, and even people like me with all the expletives you and others would like to add on with the name calling, would have no reason to be suspiscious. If it was the reverse in the last election and Trump denied any investigation I would feel exactly the same way because I am not that prescious.

Take this as you will. I won't be offended by any sarcasm or sillyness in your reply, but you know that what I have explained makes sense. This is all about integrity and nothing personal.
 


Grombleton

Surrounded by <div>s
Dec 31, 2011
7,356
Special treatment :lolol: If I wrote bungle**** on here I would be removed from thread, suspended or even banned, double standards demonstrated. :lolol:

This just makes my posting on here even more worthwhile. Were you a bully at school by the way?

Surely it's everyone else's fault that you get banned?
 




symyjym

Banned
Nov 2, 2009
13,138
Brighton / Hove actually
Well good fellow I believe the way is to be friendly, even to the uneducated, and jolly them along. Strike when they overstep. Wind them up if bored. Never debate and never answer their questions.

Trump is the loser not you. Man up for ****sake. You’ve got the Eton boys to be happy with.

Are you concerned that in a democratic election if 70 million want an investigation that is refused, that it can still be called a democratic election? If it really was fair Biden would have more to gain if it was proved fair.
 


clapham_gull

Legacy Fan
Aug 20, 2003
25,878
What would you do without me? I make your warden job so much more worthwhile. I even get your disclaimers added to my posts now :lolol:

I will take this as a compliment and I shall look forward to this addition on every post I make.

Anyway in all seriousness, do you really believe that in a so called democratic election, that if more or less half the voting public, say 70 million, will ever accept the result without a full investigation of possible corruption in the voting system and unite under Biden? He is calling for the country to unite isn't he?

If the evidence of corruption is as weak as claimed he would be much better off allowing it. Then, if it does turn out that it was fair, the people who are feeling cheated now would be more likely to stand united with each other and there be calm.

Without any investigation there will be a dark cloud over his presidency and it won't just be at home in the US.

Any reasonable person should be able to understand this because at least in the last election we know that it was 100% fair. Even the Democrats had no complaints about the vote count.

Biden allowing an investigation would make him look so much the better person, and even people like me with all the expletives you and others would like to add on with the name calling, would have no reason to be suspiscious. If it was the reverse in the last election and Trump denied any investigation I would feel exactly the same way because I am not that prescious.

Take this as you will. I won't be offended by any sarcasm or sillyness in your reply, but you know that what I have explained makes sense. This is all about integrity and nothing personal.

How could Biden stop an investigation ?
 


Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,372
Withdean area
What would you do without me? I make your warden job so much more worthwhile. I even get your disclaimers added to my posts now :lolol:

I will take this as a compliment and I shall look forward to this addition on every post I make.

Anyway in all seriousness, do you really believe that in a so called democratic election, that if more or less half the voting public, say 70 million, will ever accept the result without a full investigation of possible corruption in the voting system and unite under Biden? He is calling for the country to unite isn't he?

If the evidence of corruption is as weak as claimed he would be much better off allowing it. Then, if it does turn out that it was fair, the people who are feeling cheated now would be more likely to stand united with each other and there be calm.

Without any investigation there will be a dark cloud over his presidency and it won't just be at home in the US.

Any reasonable person should be able to understand this because at least in the last election we know that it was 100% fair. Even the Democrats had no complaints about the vote count.

Biden allowing an investigation would make him look so much the better person, and even people like me with all the expletives you and others would like to add on with the name calling, would have no reason to be suspiscious. If it was the reverse in the last election and Trump denied any investigation I would feel exactly the same way because I am not that prescious.

Take this as you will. I won't be offended by any sarcasm or sillyness in your reply, but you know that what I have explained makes sense. This is all about integrity and nothing personal.

Biden can’t stop any investigations. He’s simply a President Elect, not in any office.

It’s down to the courts.
 




symyjym

Banned
Nov 2, 2009
13,138
Brighton / Hove actually
Surely it's everyone else's fault that you get banned?

No I take full responsibility for Guiness Boy removing me, but calling people a c*** and not being banned or removed themselves is a double standard. I have never used that disgusting word on here. I get removed or banned for calling people pricks. There is a massive differnce you know.
 


The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
26,210
West is BEST
Are you concerned that in a democratic election if 70 million want an investigation that is refused, that it can still be called a democratic election? If it really was fair Biden would have more to gain if it was proved fair.

That’s simply not how it works. If there’s no case to answer, there’s no case to answer.
 


The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
26,210
West is BEST
No I take full responsibility for Guiness Boy removing me, but calling people a c*** and not being banned or removed themselves is a double standard. I have never used that disgusting word on here. I get removed or banned for calling people pricks. There is a massive differnce you know.

Jesus, you’re a whiny little poopsie aren’t you. Nut the heck up, it’s not all about you.
 




knocky1

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2010
13,110
Are you concerned that in a democratic election if 70 million want an investigation that is refused, that it can still be called a democratic election? If it really was fair Biden would have more to gain if it was proved fair.

I immediately found this pityingly easy to answer, so I nearly broke my non debating with the far right rule. Then I realised that your statement is nonsensical.

Golf may help you.
 


symyjym

Banned
Nov 2, 2009
13,138
Brighton / Hove actually
Biden can’t stop any investigations. He’s simply a President Elect, not in any office.

It’s down to the courts.

Either way, when he gets in he should start an investigation. He can promise that now and encourage the courts to do so before he enters office

if the US want to be seen as democratic they should allow a full investigation otherwise his presidency will have a dark cloud over it. It's not a good look.

There is no getting around it whether indtigated by the courts or by him. Really depends if he really wants to unite the country or not.
 




BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
18,229
Are you concerned that in a democratic election if 70 million want an investigation that is refused, that it can still be called a democratic election? If it really was fair Biden would have more to gain if it was proved fair.
I thought the process had started. Trump has had allegations of voter fraud thrown out of court via his lawyers hasn't he?

The only reason there would need to be an investigation into the election would surely be if there were some compelling evidence of wrong doing.

Not just because the incumbent cannot accept defeat and his followers blindly follow his lead.

Trump has avenues to explore to contest the election and only time will tell how that plays out. He'll have to provide some evidence though.

Sent from my Redmi Note 7 using Tapatalk
 






Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,372
Withdean area
Either way, when he gets in he should start an investigation. He can promise that now and encourage the courts to do so before he enters office

if the US want to be seen as democratic they should allow a full investigation otherwise his presidency will have a dark cloud over it. It's not a good look.

There is no getting around it whether indtigated by the courts or by him. Really depends if he really wants to unite the country or not.

You got it wrong, but won’t come clean :lolol:.

The court processes will be sufficient.

Why waste valuable time in 2021, when the new administration will be busy undoing 4 years of spiteful work.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here