Weststander
Well-known member
What about his sprint back deep into our half to make a tackle, superb stuff and the type of play that CH would have enjoyed
I just have blinked and missed that key moment of the match.
What about his sprint back deep into our half to make a tackle, superb stuff and the type of play that CH would have enjoyed
Updated with Newcastle ratings.
Dunk still out in front with season average 7.69, March up slightly to 7.31 and Duffy now 6.99.
I'll probably give this thread a kick every month or so to look at the general trends, but mostly I'll update in the match-by-match rating threads.
If only people didn't give ridiculously low ratings because they're pissed off at a result.
So go for a median average instead of mean, for each game. Then mean average of all the games.Indeed. I did laugh at the 2 that Rosenior got from one guy in the Bournemouth defeat.
Updated spreadsheet here, including the Arsenal game.
Dunk unsurprisingly still way out in front for the season and will probably keep that position for a while, even if he has a couple of stinkers.
I'm off on holiday the morning after the Everton game (yes I'm going on holiday etc etc) and probably won't get a chance to update the sheet for that game. So I expect the next update will be after the Southampton game on Oct 29, and that'll include Everton and West Ham games as well.
Based on your data I've cracked out a quick and dirty chart of players' performances by game, which shows a distinct overall improvement as we've gone on. Bodes well!
View attachment 89962
So go for a median average instead of mean, for each game. Then mean average of all the games.
Based on your data I've cracked out a quick and dirty chart of players' performances by game, which shows a distinct overall improvement as we've gone on. Bodes well!
View attachment 89962
It would just mean that each player gets a whole number or half number for each single game, but then they'd have a more specific mark over the course of the season. I can't see the problem with that.Not a big fan of median averages for this, as it would tie all marks to the integer (or possibly half point) which I think is a bit brutal.
Sounds good.What I did consider was knocking off the two highest and two lowest marks, like how diving/gymnastics(?) is marked.
Fair enough.But I haven't got the spreadsheet skillzzz for that. I'm mostly happy with how it is though... having the odd outlying mark is a fair reflection of NSC and broader Albion support. Unless I spot people deliberately trying to game the system, I'm going to leave it how it is for now.
We lost our first two games, we've done better since then - that's all you need to know that there will be a perceived overall improvement.Based on your data I've cracked out a quick and dirty chart of players' performances by game, which shows a distinct overall improvement as we've gone on. Bodes well!